Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[CLOUDSTACK-10197] Update DisplayText of XenServer tools ISO entry in the database when it already exists - #2470
Conversation
Besides updating the ISO display text, I also created unit test cases for 'createXenServerToolsIsoEntryInDatabase' and 'getActualIsoTemplate' methods.
c9d862a to
4a4a08cCompare
khos2ow
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM. Thanks @rafaelweingartner, I just noticed I've never pushed the changes you requested on #2365 !
khos2ow
commented
Feb 28, 2018
@rafaelweingartner It seems you have some "trailing spaces" issues on |
4a4a08c to
77d0912Comparerafaelweingartner
commented
Feb 28, 2018
@khos2ow thanks for the review. |
77d0912 to
87cca11Compare
DaanHoogland
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nice cleanup again @rafaelweingartner
rafaelweingartner
commented
Mar 3, 2018
What do you think @DaanHoogland, do wee need to wait for integration tests here? |
DaanHoogland
commented
Mar 5, 2018
@rafaelweingartner doesn't hurt does it? |
blueorangutan
commented
Mar 5, 2018
@DaanHoogland a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
DaanHoogland
commented
Mar 5, 2018
@rhtyd can you review this, please? |
blueorangutan
commented
Mar 5, 2018
Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-1750 |
rafaelweingartner
commented
Mar 5, 2018
@DaanHoogland no it does not ;) |
DaanHoogland
commented
Mar 5, 2018
@blueorangutan test |
blueorangutan
commented
Mar 5, 2018
@DaanHoogland a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
blueorangutan
commented
Mar 5, 2018
Trillian test result (tid-2313)
|
rafaelweingartner
commented
Mar 5, 2018
@DaanHoogland is this "test_hostha_enable_ha_when_host_in_maintenance" an intermittent error? I have seen this on #2425, which is a very different PR. |
DaanHoogland
commented
Mar 5, 2018
Yes @rafaelweingartner , I've seen this one a lot and seen it pass as well. Your code here is not related to that test afaik. |
rafaelweingartner
commented
Mar 7, 2018
@DaanHoogland this one seems to be ready. Would you like to wait for a third and fourth eyes here? |
DaanHoogland
commented
Mar 8, 2018
@rafaelweingartner no it is fine |
Changes here were suggestions made to #2365, but for some reason, the PR was merged without considering them. Both the update of the ‘displayText’ value and unit test cases were suggested as improvements in that PR.
After coding, I also when through those classes and removed unused variables.
@khos2ow can you take a look here?