Added configuration and Integration test to restrict public template … by soreana · Pull Request #4774 · apache/cloudstack

soreana · 2021-03-09T10:02:13Z

Description

As a cloud provider, we don't want our customers to see other templates. This pr limits template access to the domain.

Types of changes

Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

Major
Minor

How Has This Been Tested?

To test this feature, I created two domains named Test0, Test1 and Test2, each with their respective domain admins (test0, test1 and test2).
I used cloudmonkey command to list different combination of templateFilters ( all, featured, self, selfexecutable, sharedexecutable, executable and community ) and accounts ( admin, test0, test1 and test2 ).

Pre configuration:

Create three domain with their respective domain admin accounts.
Register new template for each account like the following table.
Follow the test cases.

Owner	Templates
Admin	U20, SystemVM
Test0	U0
Test1	U1
Test2	U2

Test case one.

Set share.public.templates to false for every domain
List templates in every account. You can't see any templates except the owneres templates.

Test case two

Set share.public.templates like the following table.
List templates in test0 account. You should see combination of the U20, U0, U2 with different templatefilter but not U1

Owner	share.public.templates
Admin	true
Test0	Doesn't matter
Test1	false
Test2	true

Test case three

Set share.public.templates like the test case two
List templates in test0 with template id. You should be ablet to see the U20, U0, U2 but empty result if you use U1 id.

I wrote this script to test this pr, you can find it in the following link. You need the cmk command and you should put admin, test1, and test2 users info in the cmk configuration file. How to run this?

Put account names in accounts array defined at top of the script
./listTemplates.sh will list all filter for all accounts
./listTemplates.sh list all templates using all possible filters for
./listTemplates.sh list all templates for accounts in ('admin' 'test' 'test2') using
./listTemplates.sh list all templates for using

harikrishna-patnala · 2021-03-09T10:44:03Z

@blueorangutan package

blueorangutan · 2021-03-09T10:45:05Z

@harikrishna-patnala a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

blueorangutan · 2021-03-09T11:20:01Z

Packaging result: ✔centos7 ✔centos8 ✔debian. JID-2890

harikrishna-patnala · 2021-03-09T12:26:01Z

@soreana, does this have any impact on upgrades, existing templates in the environment might have already shared and used across domains. Does a domain lose viewing or accessing the templates which are already used when the configuration parameter is set to true.

blueorangutan · 2021-03-09T14:38:02Z

Packaging result: ✖️ centos7 ✖️ centos8 ✔️ debian. SL-JID 59

blueorangutan · 2021-03-09T17:18:48Z

Packaging result: ✔️ centos7 ✖️ centos8 ✔️ debian. SL-JID 63

soreana · 2021-03-09T19:20:09Z

@harikrishna-patnala I didn't noticed any issue. Here is what I tested today.

Set the global setting to false (templates shared between domains).
Created the instance (named INSTANCE) in test2 domain using Debian template (which belongs to test1 domain)
Set the global setting to false (templates shared between domains).
Debian Template was removed from the template list.
I tested everything related to INSTANCE including: VNC console, Migration, Stop, Start, Reboot, Snapshot
I found nothing.

Let me know if you have other concerns.

Btw, while I tried to reinstall the INSTANCE I lost access to Debian template which is legitimate behaviour. See attached.

Without restriction (global setting sets to false)

With restriction (global setting sets to true)

harikrishna-patnala · 2021-03-10T05:36:19Z

@soreana I have raised the question exactly like Reinstall VM you mentioned above, loosing access to the template which are already in use. May be keeping the configuration scope to Domain level will give flexibility in allowing access in these cases.

Let's hear from others too. Thanks.

DaanHoogland · 2021-03-11T09:12:44Z

Not that I want to intrude on your discussion @soreana @harikrishna-patnala , but would it make sense to add a scope to the filter:

all, featured, self, selfexecutable, sharedexecutable, executable, community, domain

soreana · 2021-03-11T09:16:37Z

@DaanHoogland It is nice feature. But it will not address access right issue fixed in this pr.

soreana · 2021-03-11T09:53:16Z

@harikrishna-patnala In regards to your Reinstall VM comment. If test1 user (who owned the template) makes it private, test2 user (who used the template) will lose access to the template and he/she can't see that template in the Reinstall VM list.

As a result, with or without these changes, the test2 user might lose access to the template. It is an inherent risk in using community templates. :D

Reinstall VM before making Debian template private

Reinstall VM after making Debian template private

harikrishna-patnala · 2021-03-15T06:40:03Z

Thanks @soreana for testing further. If you can add scope to domain that will be great.

soreana · 2021-03-16T14:29:52Z

@harikrishna-patnala I updated the PR. I migrated the setting to the domain level. It is a limited code change required to do so :D. I tested that with subdomains as well. More details:

Root (Ubuntu)
|-- domain0 (Debian)
| |-- sub0 (Fedora)
| |-- sub1
|-- domain1

If you set restrict.public.template.access.to.domain to true for domain1, domain1 access to Debian and Fedora will be limited.

If you set restrict.public.template.access.to.domain to true for sub1, sub1 access to Fedora will be limited.

Let me know if you have other concerns.

P.S: I'm updating the test cases.

nvazquez · 2021-06-23T14:28:51Z

Hi @soreana looks like the PR has a conflict, can you please resolve it?

harikrishna-patnala · 2021-06-24T06:16:37Z

domain scope change looks good @soreana, please resolve the conflicts on the PR.

soreana · 2021-07-09T13:17:01Z

I fixed the conflict.
@nvazquez @harikrishna-patnala Sorry for the late response. As I was away for couple of weeks, I completely forgot about this.

nvazquez · 2021-07-13T02:12:41Z

No problem, thanks @soreana
@blueorangutan package

blueorangutan · 2021-07-13T02:13:03Z

@nvazquez a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

blueorangutan · 2021-07-13T03:03:47Z

Packaging result: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ debian. SL-JID 528

nvazquez · 2021-07-13T03:06:42Z

@blueorangutan test

blueorangutan · 2021-07-13T03:07:03Z

@nvazquez a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests

DaanHoogland

code looks generally good, needs testing and some remarks on the integration test

blueorangutan · 2021-07-13T17:07:24Z

Trillian test result (tid-1246)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 46884 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr4774-t1246-kvm-centos7.zip
Intermittent failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_kubernetes_clusters.py
Intermittent failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_routers_network_ops.py
Intermittent failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py
Intermittent failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_vpn.py
Smoke tests completed. 84 look OK, 4 have error(s)
Only failed tests results shown below:

Test	Result	Time (s)	Test File
ContextSuite context=TestKubernetesCluster>:teardown	`Error`	72.00	test_kubernetes_clusters.py
test_01_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_true	`Failure`	396.74	test_routers_network_ops.py
test_02_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH_default_routes_egress_false	`Failure`	341.05	test_routers_network_ops.py
test_01_create_redundant_VPC_2tiers_4VMs_4IPs_4PF_ACL	`Failure`	539.81	test_vpc_redundant.py
test_02_redundant_VPC_default_routes	`Failure`	373.90	test_vpc_redundant.py
test_03_create_redundant_VPC_1tier_2VMs_2IPs_2PF_ACL_reboot_routers	`Failure`	549.32	test_vpc_redundant.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers	`Failure`	553.14	test_vpc_redundant.py
test_05_rvpc_multi_tiers	`Error`	553.16	test_vpc_redundant.py
test_01_vpc_site2site_vpn_multiple_options	`Failure`	305.87	test_vpc_vpn.py

nvazquez · 2021-08-25T04:11:23Z

@soreana can you address the open comments on the marvin tests?

yadvr · 2022-04-20T19:13:28Z

@blueorangutan package

blueorangutan · 2022-04-20T19:14:03Z

@rohityadavcloud a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with

SystemVM template(s). I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

blueorangutan · 2022-04-20T21:07:43Z

Packaging result: ✔️ el7 ✖️ el8 ✖️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 3251

nvazquez · 2022-04-21T01:55:21Z

@blueorangutan package

blueorangutan · 2022-04-21T01:57:03Z

@nvazquez a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

blueorangutan · 2022-04-21T02:37:40Z

Packaging result: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 3255

nvazquez · 2022-04-21T02:38:29Z

@blueorangutan test

blueorangutan · 2022-04-21T02:39:03Z

@nvazquez a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests

sureshanaparti · 2022-04-21T11:14:40Z

@sureshanaparti please advise if this is ready after your testing, thanks

@nvazquez @soreana test LGTM

Manually covered with the following tests, and verified the public templates access restricted to other domains when the global or the respective domain's config "share.public.templates.with.other.domains" is set to false.

Created domains: Domain1 and Domain2.
Created accounts/users: Domain1Admin and Domain2Admin.
Registered public templates from macchinina-admin from Admin account.
Registered public templates from macchinina-domain1, centos65-domain1 from Domain1Admin account.
Registered public templates from macchinina-domain2, centos65-domain2 from Domain2Admin account.

Tests with global level setting:
(i) The global config "share.public.templates.with.other.domains" is set to true by default, and all the public templates of domain1/domain2 are listed for admin, domain1 admin, and domain2 admin.
(ii) Set the global config "restrict.public.template.access.to.domain" to false. Verified the public templates of domain1 are not listed for domain2 admin, and the public templates of domain2 are not listed for domain1 admin. All the public templates are listed for root admin.

Tests with domain level setting:
(i) Set Domain1 config "share.public.templates.with.other.domains": true and Domain2 config "share.public.templates.with.other.domains": false
=> All the public templates are listed for root admin. 
=> The public templates of domain1 are listed for domain2 admin.
=> The public templates of domain2 are not listed for domain1 admin.
(ii) Set Domain1 config "share.public.templates.with.other.domains": false and Domain2 config "share.public.templates.with.other.domains": true 
=> All the public templates are listed for root admin. 
=> The public templates of domain1 are not listed for domain2 admin. 
=> The public templates of domain2 are listed for domain1 admin.
(iii) Set Domain1 config "share.public.templates.with.other.domains": true and Domain2 config "share.public.templates.with.other.domains": true 
=> All the public templates are listed for root admin. 
=> The public templates of domain1 are listed for domain2 admin 
=> The public templates of domain2 are listed for domain1 admin
(iv) Set Domain1 config "share.public.templates.with.other.domains": false and Domain2 config "share.public.templates.with.other.domains": false 
=> All the public templates are listed for root admin. 
=> The public templates of domain1 are not listed for domain2 admin
=> The public templates of domain2 are not listed for domain1 admin

nvazquez · 2022-04-21T12:13:38Z

Hi @soreana all looking good except travis that is still failing in all these cases:

==== Marvin Init Successful ====
=== TestName: test_01_check_cross_domain_template_access | Status : EXCEPTION ===
=== TestName: test_02_create_template | Status : EXCEPTION ===
=== TestName: test_03_check_subdomain_template_access | Status : EXCEPTION ===
=== TestName: test_04_check_non_public_template_access | Status : EXCEPTION ===
=== TestName: test_05_check_non_public_template_subdomain_access | Status : EXCEPTION ===
=== TestName: test_06_check_sub_public_template_sub_domain_access | Status : EXCEPTION ===
=== TestName: test_07_check_default_public_template_sub_domain_access | Status : EXCEPTION ===
=== TestName: test_08_check_non_public_template_sub_domain_access | Status : EXCEPTION ===

weizhouapache · 2022-04-21T12:14:21Z

+ Function to update the global setting "restrict.public.access.to.templates" for domain
+ """
+ update_configuration_cmd = updateConfiguration.updateConfigurationCmd()
+ update_configuration_cmd.name = "restrict.public.template.access.to.domain"


@soreana
since you have changed the name of global configuration to share.public.templates.with.other.domains, can you change the name in component test ? (maybe the value as well)

The test needs to be updated to use the new configuration name

acs-robot · 2022-04-21T13:07:33Z

Found UI changes, kicking a new UI QA build
@blueorangutan ui

blueorangutan · 2022-04-21T13:25:53Z

Trillian test result (tid-3958)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 37433 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr4774-t3958-kvm-centos7.zip
Smoke tests completed. 95 look OK, 1 have errors
Only failed tests results shown below:

Test	Result	Time (s)	Test File
test_01_nic	`Error`	141.55	test_nic.py

acs-robot · 2022-04-21T13:47:30Z

PR Coverage Report

CLASS	INSTRUCTION MISSED	INSTRUCTION COVERED	BRANCH MISSED	BRANCH COVERED	LINE MISSED	LINE COVERED






Network	554	0	42	0	107	0









Volume	109	0	2	0	44	0


































NetworkOrchestrationService	0	101	0	0	0	10





StorageManager	0	211	0	0	0	18
AgentAttache	1042	0	124	0	219	0
AgentManagerImpl	3463	0	380	0	714	0
ClusteredAgentManagerImpl	2361	0	242	0	536	0
NetworkOrchestrator	9722	0	1198	0	1914	0
VolumeOrchestrator	5170	0	560	0	977	0

DataCenterVnetVO	58	0	0	0	24	0
VlanVO	186	0	2	0	72	0
AccountGuestVlanMapVO	46	0	0	0	19	0

NetworkDaoImpl	3307	0	116	0	467	0
NetworkOfferingVO	414	31	0	0	126	12
SnapshotVO	172	58	12	0	48	20
VolumeVO	529	133	4	0	179	39

SnapshotDaoImpl	768	0	8	0	128	0
Upgrade41610to41700	82	7	4	0	23	2
DomainRouterDaoImpl	1604	0	22	0	228	0

DirectDownloadCertificateHostMapDaoImpl	121	0	0	0	18	0
DirectDownloadCertificateHostMapVO	54	0	4	0	19	0


AncientDataMotionStrategy	1458	52	170	4	338	10
DefaultSnapshotStrategy	758	220	100	10	164	37
SnapshotDataFactoryImpl	152	58	15	5	37	13
DefaultVMSnapshotStrategy	486	677	52	30	100	140
ScaleIOVMSnapshotStrategy	1063	4	80	0	224	1

StorageStrategyFactoryImpl	37	77	1	5	8	18
SnapshotDataStoreDaoImpl	1683	60	44	2	292	13
DefaultHostListener	537	0	40	0	101	0
VolumeObject	773	665	77	39	178	117


LibvirtComputingResource	8927	1961	1096	140	1992	444
LibvirtVMDef	37	114	6	4	11	36
LibvirtMigrateCommandWrapper	977	383	158	36	228	98
LibvirtReadyCommandWrapper	8	37	2	2	1	10
LibvirtRevertSnapshotCommandWrapper	387	130	20	0	69	16
LibvirtUtilitiesHelper	115	58	4	2	27	8
IscsiAdmStorageAdaptor	981	0	52	0	178	0
IscsiAdmStoragePool	129	0	0	0	32	0
KVMStoragePoolManager	926	4	76	0	192	1
KVMStorageProcessor	5992	498	448	22	1239	71
LibvirtStorageAdaptor	3376	19	257	0	797	2
LibvirtStoragePool	239	89	15	9	64	29
LinstorStorageAdaptor	1076	0	50	0	246	0
ManagedNfsStorageAdaptor	446	0	20	0	125	0
ScaleIOStorageAdaptor	684	121	75	13	152	31

KVMHostInfo	150	146	10	4	30	38
QemuImg	674	0	64	0	160	0




MockVmManagerImpl	1495	0	90	0	338	0
VmwareServerDiscoverer	1586	0	182	0	378	0
VmwareManagerImpl	2613	528	296	38	615	117
VmwareResource	20060	0	2242	0	4330	0
VmwareStorageProcessor	9892	9	940	0	2122	2
XcpServerDiscoverer	1554	101	176	6	345	21
CitrixResourceBase	14566	557	1452	34	3160	122
CitrixReadyCommandWrapper	58	37	3	1	15	11

KubernetesClusterManagerImpl	4724	0	480	0	760	0
KubernetesClusterVO	298	0	6	0	109	0
KubernetesClusterActionWorker	1540	0	114	0	281	0
KubernetesClusterResourceModifierActionWorker	1843	0	140	0	325	0
KubernetesClusterStartWorker	2678	0	168	0	426	0
ListVMsMetricsCmd	39	0	0	0	10	0

MetricsServiceImpl	1673	0	98	0	337	0
NetScalerControlCenterResource	1943	0	144	0	468	0
NetscalerResource	6882	0	806	0	1623	0

ElastistorHostListener	150	0	14	0	30	0
DateraPrimaryDataStoreDriver	3195	0	283	0	748	0
DateraHostListener	635	0	74	0	136	0
CloudStackPrimaryDataStoreDriverImpl	903	0	114	0	229	0
LinstorPrimaryDataStoreDriverImpl	1442	0	91	0	348	0



ScaleIOPrimaryDataStoreDriver	2537	0	246	0	537	0
ScaleIOHostListener	196	0	14	0	43	0
SolidFirePrimaryDataStoreDriver	3347	0	284	0	697	0
SolidFireHostListener	545	0	60	0	112	0
SolidFireSharedHostListener	407	0	30	0	82	0
SAMLUtils	202	465	41	11	53	108


DomainChecker	1206	0	300	0	238	0
ApiDBUtils	2367	0	210	0	590	0
ApiResponseHelper	12144	0	1274	0	2779	0
ParamProcessWorker	1050	0	155	0	241	0
QueryManagerImpl	14233	0	1248	0	2403	0
ViewResponseHelper	1662	0	150	0	305	0

UserVmJoinDaoImpl	1531	0	184	0	328	0
VolumeJoinDaoImpl	770	0	94	0	171	0
VolumeJoinVO	267	0	0	0	93	0
Config	152	5162	30	6	42	342
ConfigurationManagerImpl	18104	0	3032	0	3570	0
LibvirtServerDiscoverer	988	0	116	0	218	0
IpAddressManagerImpl	4045	0	461	0	806	0
NetworkModelImpl	6182	0	838	0	1300	0
NetworkServiceImpl	13372	0	1862	0	2548	0
AutoScaleManagerImpl	3297	0	320	0	691	0
ConfigDriveNetworkElement	1466	0	173	0	306	0
FirewallManagerImpl	2522	0	391	0	455	0
GuestNetworkGuru	622	298	98	34	124	64
PrivateNetworkGuru	394	0	46	0	88	0
LoadBalancingRulesManagerImpl	6024	0	666	0	1254	0
NetworkHelperImpl	2019	0	264	0	428	0
RulesManagerImpl	4074	0	492	0	790	0
SecurityGroupManagerImpl	2330	0	260	0	497	0
NetworkACLServiceImpl	2698	0	302	0	520	0
VpcManagerImpl	6870	0	758	0	1311	0
ResourceManagerImpl	8512	0	982	0	1658	0
ConfigurationServerImpl	2075	0	178	0	499	0
ManagementServerImpl	11819	0	1052	0	2361	0
StatsCollector	1875	0	104	0	308	0
StorageManagerImpl	8547	0	974	0	1704	0
VolumeApiServiceImpl	10851	0	1500	0	2035	0
StoragePoolMonitor	427	0	72	0	107	0
SnapshotManager	107	0	0	0	9	0
SnapshotManagerImpl	4186	0	410	0	751	0
TaggedResourceManagerImpl	473	0	58	0	96	0
TemplateManagerImpl	4996	0	696	0	1042	0
AccountManagerImpl	6446	0	906	0	1351	0
UserVmManagerImpl	20798	0	2566	0	3869	0
VMSnapshotManagerImpl	3135	0	292	0	623	0
BackupManagerImpl	2776	0	224	0	488	0
DirectDownloadManagerImpl	1679	0	186	0	361	0
UnmanagedVMsManagerImpl	4881	0	542	0	800	0














MockNetworkManagerImpl	485	0	22	0	83	0

























PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl	775	0	64	0	116	0
SecondaryStorageManagerImpl	3494	149	343	11	623	32

VirtualMachineMO	8953	135	1063	17	1982	31

…PR: apache#4774 in commit e94c1e2. Had to make a few changes to support 4.11 and cleanup some of the quirks.

* Pulling in the relevant parts of the global settings version of this PR: apache#4774 in commit e94c1e2. Had to make a few changes to support 4.11 and cleanup some of the quirks. * Making the 'allow.public.user.templates' global setting allow domain and resource admins to still upload public templates. Previously it was limited to just root admins. * One additional template filter type that includes public templates * Fixing permissions bug where there weren't permissions to templates in child domains * Updating comments based on code review * Was previously allowing public, but not featured for domain admins. Added featured for domain admins. Also limited public to only when the new setting is enabled.

harikrishna-patnala reviewed Mar 9, 2021
View reviewed changes

Comment threadengine/components-api/src/main/java/com/cloud/template/TemplateManager.java Outdated

DaanHoogland added this to the 4.16.0.0 milestone Mar 11, 2021

nvazquez added type:security component:templates labels Jul 13, 2021

DaanHoogland reviewed Jul 13, 2021
View reviewed changes

nvazquez added the status:needs-testing label Aug 25, 2021

soreana force-pushed the template-restriction branch from 4db539b to b9ec1deCompare August 25, 2021 14:30

sureshanaparti approved these changes Apr 21, 2022
View reviewed changes

weizhouapache reviewed Apr 21, 2022
View reviewed changes

Comment thread.travis.yml Outdated

Update .travis.yml to remove the component test
4711e57
The test needs to be updated to use the new configuration name

boring-cyborgBot added component:api component:integration-test Python Warning... Python code Ahead! labels Apr 21, 2022

weizhouapache closed this Apr 21, 2022

weizhouapache reopened this Apr 21, 2022

nvazquez closed this Apr 21, 2022

nvazquez reopened this Apr 21, 2022

nvazquez merged commit debfb45 into apache:mainApr 22, 2022

nlgordon added a commit to ippathways/cloudstack that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2022
Pulling in the relevant parts of the global settings version of this …
c4d2186
…PR: apache#4774 in commit e94c1e2. Had to make a few changes to support 4.11 and cleanup some of the quirks.

winterhazel mentioned this pull request Sep 18, 2023
Fix templates and ISOs listing pagination #7974
Merged
12 tasks

weizhouapache mentioned this pull request Dec 15, 2023
Add all accounts/projects when managing templates/ISO #8361
Closed

DaanHoogland removed the status:needs-testing label Jan 28, 2026

Uh oh!

Conversation

soreana commented Mar 9, 2021• edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Description

Types of changes

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

How Has This Been Tested?

Pre configuration:

Test case one.

Test case two

Test case three

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

harikrishna-patnala commented Mar 9, 2021

Uh oh!

blueorangutan commented Mar 9, 2021

Uh oh!

blueorangutan commented Mar 9, 2021

Uh oh!

harikrishna-patnala commented Mar 9, 2021• edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

blueorangutan commented Mar 9, 2021

Uh oh!

blueorangutan commented Mar 9, 2021

Uh oh!

soreana commented Mar 9, 2021

Without restriction (global setting sets to false)

With restriction (global setting sets to true)

Uh oh!

harikrishna-patnala commented Mar 10, 2021

Uh oh!

DaanHoogland commented Mar 11, 2021

Uh oh!

soreana commented Mar 11, 2021

Uh oh!

soreana commented Mar 11, 2021• edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Reinstall VM before making Debian template private

Reinstall VM after making Debian template private

Uh oh!

harikrishna-patnala commented Mar 15, 2021

Uh oh!

soreana commented Mar 16, 2021• edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

nvazquez commented Jun 23, 2021

Uh oh!

harikrishna-patnala commented Jun 24, 2021

Uh oh!

soreana commented Jul 9, 2021

Uh oh!

nvazquez commented Jul 13, 2021

Uh oh!

blueorangutan commented Jul 13, 2021

Uh oh!

blueorangutan commented Jul 13, 2021

Uh oh!

nvazquez commented Jul 13, 2021

Uh oh!

blueorangutan commented Jul 13, 2021

Uh oh!

DaanHoogland left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

blueorangutan commented Jul 13, 2021

Uh oh!

nvazquez commented Aug 25, 2021

soreana commented Mar 9, 2021•
edited
Loading

harikrishna-patnala commented Mar 9, 2021•
edited
Loading

soreana commented Mar 11, 2021•
edited
Loading

soreana commented Mar 16, 2021•
edited
Loading