api: return volumes in user vm response

[shwstppr]

Description

TBA

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• build/CI

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (b00fd6b) 29.14% compared to head (4bab25d) 29.23%.
Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #8330 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 29.14% 29.23% +0.08% - Complexity 31270 31423 +153 
============================================
Files 5251 5260 +9 Lines 368801 369711 +910 Branches 53766 53890 +124 ============================================
+ Hits 107485 108081 +596 - Misses 246607 246853 +246 - Partials 14709 14777 +68 

Flag	Coverage Δ
simulator-marvin-tests	25.07% <100.00%> (+0.04%)	⬆️
uitests	4.42% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
unit-tests	14.99% <ø> (+0.09%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[DaanHoogland]

@shwstppr you want to finish this or shall i take over?

[shwstppr]

@DaanHoogland

@shwstppr you want to finish this or shall i take over?

I guess I should be able to make changes for this later today or tomorrow. Otherwise I'll sync with you to take this over

[shwstppr]

Needs more work. Closing for now