Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
server: apply rules when VR of Domain VPC is recreated - #8354
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@## 4.19 #8354 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 22.25% 30.75% +8.49% - Complexity 22439 33065 +10626
============================================
Files 5117 5353 +236 Lines 346819 374603 +27784 Branches 49790 54634 +4844 ============================================
+ Hits 77190 115196 +38006 + Misses 258466 244117 -14349 - Partials 11163 15290 +4127
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
DaanHoogland
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
clgtm, looks like a good cleanup
DaanHoogland
commented
Dec 14, 2023
@blueorangutan package |
blueorangutan
commented
Dec 14, 2023
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
blueorangutan
commented
Dec 14, 2023
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 8051 |
shwstppr
commented
Dec 15, 2023
@blueorangutan test |
blueorangutan
commented
Dec 15, 2023
@shwstppr a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
blueorangutan
commented
Dec 16, 2023
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-8599)
|
GutoVeronezi
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just a minor adjustment.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Co-authored-by: Daniel Augusto Veronezi Salvador <38945620+GutoVeronezi@users.noreply.github.com>
DaanHoogland
commented
Feb 16, 2024
@blueorangutan package |
blueorangutan
commented
Feb 16, 2024
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
blueorangutan
commented
Feb 16, 2024
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 8685 |
DaanHoogland
commented
Feb 16, 2024
@blueorangutan test |
blueorangutan
commented
Feb 16, 2024
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
blueorangutan
commented
Feb 17, 2024
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-9264)
|
GaOrtiga
commented
Mar 19, 2024
@DaanHoogland@GutoVeronezi@shwstppr@JoaoJandre Is there any pending concern regarding this or can we proceed with the merge? |
@GaOrtiga |
sureshanaparti
commented
Jun 23, 2024
Ping @GaOrtiga Any update on the testing and results? |
sureshanaparti
commented
Jun 26, 2024
@blueorangutan package |
blueorangutan
commented
Jun 26, 2024
@sureshanaparti a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
blueorangutan
commented
Jun 26, 2024
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✖️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 10142 |
weizhouapache
commented
Jun 26, 2024
@blueorangutan package |
blueorangutan
commented
Jun 26, 2024
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
blueorangutan
commented
Jun 26, 2024
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 10146 |
yadvr
commented
Jun 26, 2024
Ping @GaOrtiga Any further update? |
GaOrtiga
commented
Jun 26, 2024
No updates, just needs testing, I will check if someone can test and post results. |
weizhouapache
commented
Jun 27, 2024
weizhouapache
commented
Jun 27, 2024
tested ok. cc @sureshanaparti@GaOrtiga |
GaOrtiga
commented
Jun 27, 2024
@weizhouapache Thank you for testing. Yes I will create the doc PR. |
sureshanaparti
commented
Jun 28, 2024
Hi @GaOrtiga Please update the doc PR reference here once it is ready. Thanks. |
GaOrtiga
commented
Jun 28, 2024
@weizhouapache@sureshanaparti |
* apply rules when VR is recreated * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Daniel Augusto Veronezi Salvador <38945620+GutoVeronezi@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Gabriel <gabriel.fernandes@scclouds.com.br>
Description
After re-creating a VR from a domain VPC, ACS will not apply static nat, port forward and load balancer rules to IPs that are not associated to the account that owns the VPC.
An adjustment was made to make sure that these rules are applied for all IPs when performing the following procedures:
VR restart
VPC restart
VPC restart with cleanup
recreate VR when health-check fails
recreate VR on failover
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Bug Severity
How Has This Been Tested?
In a local lab, I performed the procedures listed in the description and verified that after applying the changes, the IPs owned by accounts different than the VPC owner were having their rules applied accordingly.