Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Fix exceeding of resource limits with powerflex - #9008
Conversation
09183d3 to
b3b53a7Comparevishesh92
commented
Apr 30, 2024
@blueorangutan package |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #9008 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 4.26% 15.28% +11.01% - Complexity 0 11528 +11528
============================================
Files 363 5425 +5062 Lines 29565 474074 +444509 Branches 5190 61618 +56428 ============================================
+ Hits 1262 72462 +71200 - Misses 28160 393553 +365393 - Partials 143 8059 +7916
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
sureshanaparti
commented
Apr 30, 2024
@blueorangutan package |
blueorangutan
commented
Apr 30, 2024
@sureshanaparti a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
blueorangutan
commented
Apr 30, 2024
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 9487 |
vishesh92
commented
Apr 30, 2024
@blueorangutan test |
blueorangutan
commented
Apr 30, 2024
@vishesh92 a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
vishesh92
commented
May 1, 2024
@blueorangutan package |
blueorangutan
commented
May 1, 2024
@vishesh92 a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
blueorangutan
commented
May 1, 2024
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-10100)
|
blueorangutan
commented
May 1, 2024
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 9495 |
vishesh92
commented
May 2, 2024
@blueorangutan test |
blueorangutan
commented
May 2, 2024
@vishesh92 a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
blueorangutan
commented
May 2, 2024
[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-10140) |
vishesh92
commented
May 2, 2024
@blueorangutan test |
blueorangutan
commented
May 2, 2024
@vishesh92 a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
blueorangutan
commented
May 3, 2024
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-10148)
|
dc000a9 to
09f188eComparevishesh92
commented
May 7, 2024
@blueorangutan package |
blueorangutan
commented
May 7, 2024
@vishesh92 a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
blueorangutan
commented
May 7, 2024
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✖️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 9555 |
Co-authored-by: Suresh Kumar Anaparti <sureshkumar.anaparti@gmail.com>
09f188e to
f9e96afComparevishesh92
commented
May 7, 2024
@blueorangutan package |
blueorangutan
commented
May 7, 2024
@vishesh92 a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
blueorangutan
commented
May 7, 2024
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 9559 |
borisstoyanov
commented
May 7, 2024
@blueorangutan test keepEnv |
blueorangutan
commented
May 7, 2024
@borisstoyanov a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
blueorangutan
commented
May 8, 2024
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-10180)
|
borisstoyanov
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, manually checked that the limit is honoured when producing larger volume with Powerflex
* Fix exceeding of resource limits with powerflex * Add e2e tests * Update server/src/main/java/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java Co-authored-by: Suresh Kumar Anaparti <sureshkumar.anaparti@gmail.com> * fixup --------- Co-authored-by: Suresh Kumar Anaparti <sureshkumar.anaparti@gmail.com>
Description
Because we have the condition that a powerflex/scaleio volume can be a size /8 the user can exploit this and request a smaller number without exceeding the limit, but eventually PF will deploy a volume of size [req-size ]< and /8, thus allowing the user to break the limit
STEPS TO REPRODUCE
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?