Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Restore listNetworks behavior & clean up the code - #9461
Conversation
winterhazel
commented
Jul 29, 2024
@blueorangutan package |
blueorangutan
commented
Jul 29, 2024
@winterhazel a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@## 4.19 #9461 +/- ##
==========================================
Coverage 15.08% 15.08% Complexity 11189 11189 ==========================================
Files 5406 5406 Lines 472828 472830 +2 Branches 59879 60053 +174 ==========================================
+ Hits 71346 71350 +4 + Misses 393537 393536 -1 + Partials 7945 7944 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
blueorangutan
commented
Jul 29, 2024
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 10496 |
shwstppr
commented
Jul 29, 2024
@blueorangutan test |
blueorangutan
commented
Jul 29, 2024
@shwstppr a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
winterhazel
commented
Aug 2, 2024
@blueorangutan package |
blueorangutan
commented
Aug 2, 2024
@winterhazel a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
winterhazel
commented
Aug 2, 2024
@shwstppr could we run the CI again? There seems to have been a problem with the last run |
shwstppr
commented
Aug 2, 2024
@winterhazel sure, will do that once we have the new packages |
blueorangutan
commented
Aug 2, 2024
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 10549 |
shwstppr
commented
Aug 2, 2024
@blueorangutan test |
blueorangutan
commented
Aug 2, 2024
@shwstppr a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
shwstppr
commented
Aug 5, 2024
@blueorangutan test |
blueorangutan
commented
Aug 5, 2024
@shwstppr a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
blueorangutan
commented
Aug 5, 2024
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-11025)
|
This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch. |
* server: refactor listNetworks api database retrievals * fixes * remove unused methods * imports * fix empty searchcriteria issue * refactor Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
eb48413 to
8cf2987Compareshwstppr
commented
Aug 12, 2024
@blueorangutan package |
blueorangutan
commented
Aug 12, 2024
@shwstppr a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
blueorangutan
commented
Aug 12, 2024
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 10613 |
DaanHoogland
commented
Aug 12, 2024
@blueorangutan test |
blueorangutan
commented
Aug 12, 2024
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
blueorangutan
commented
Aug 13, 2024
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-11057)
|
JoaoJandre
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
CLGTM, did not test it.
shwstppr
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code LGTM. Reported manual and smoke tests also look good.
It would be great if we could have some more manual QA
yadvr
commented
Sep 5, 2024
cc @kiranchavala@rajujith@NuxRo@vladimirpetrov@borisstoyanov@JoaoJandre@GutoVeronezi or others - anybody able to manually QA this? Thanks. |
DaanHoogland
commented
Sep 6, 2024
@blueorangutan package |
blueorangutan
commented
Sep 6, 2024
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
blueorangutan
commented
Sep 6, 2024
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 11027 |
DaanHoogland
commented
Sep 6, 2024
@blueorangutan test keepEnv |
blueorangutan
commented
Sep 6, 2024
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
blueorangutan
commented
Sep 6, 2024
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-11402)
|
DaanHoogland
commented
Sep 9, 2024
@winterhazel , I tested very slightly (list networks does not give errors with no, or with an isolated and a shared network) but do not understand what the situation is you are trying to solve. Is there any specific situation I should test? |
Hey @DaanHoogland When I opened this PR, the This problem was introduced in an attempt to optimize the However, #9184 was reverted in Therefore, we just need to test whether the |
DaanHoogland
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
lgtm (tested and reviewed)
Co-authored-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
Description
PR #9184 attempted to optimize the
listNetworksAPI by converting the multiple queries that were performed into a single one. This was done by building multiple search criterias for the individual queries, OR-adding them to an intermediary search criteria, and AND-adding the intermediary to a final one. However, this did not work as intended, because the code does not carry the joins' conditions when adding a search criteria into another one.This PR fixes the issue, making the final query work as intended by #9184. This was done by explicitly adding the join parameters to each query's WHERE clause, which will then be included in the intermediary search criteria and in the final query. I also cleaned up the related code.
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
How Has This Been Tested?
My environment had the following domains, accounts, projects and networks (networks beginning with an "i" are isolated, and with a "s" are shared):
Through the UI, in every account, I listed the networks using the all/account/domain/shared filters with the project toggle on/off. I compared the behavior for the same environment in a commit before #9184, and verified that it was the same. Below is a table showing which networks were listed for each account and filter combination.
[1] When filtering by domain, I got
Invalid value of networkfilter: domainpath. This was already present before #9184.[2] This is probably not the intended behavior, and was already present before #9184. It can be fixed in a separate PR, as this one only aims to restore the original filtering behavior.