Add validation for secstorage.allowed.internal.sites

[vishesh92]

Description

This PR fixes#9530 by adding validation on update of secstorage.allowed.internal.sites to allow only valid CIDRs. This PR also enables logging of WARN messages for the existing wrong configurations.

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• build/CI
• test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 42.10526% with 11 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 15.08%. Comparing base (1a403f1) to head (4ba14ef).
Report is 15 commits behind head on 4.19.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
.../cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java	0.00%	6 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
.../secondarystorage/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
...ls/src/main/java/com/cloud/utils/net/NetUtils.java	80.00%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## 4.19 #9567 +/- ##
==========================================
Coverage 15.08% 15.08% - Complexity 11181 11186 +5 
==========================================
Files 5406 5406 Lines 472915 472935 +20 Branches 58400 57960 -440 ==========================================
+ Hits 71336 71356 +20 + Misses 393637 393633 -4 - Partials 7942 7946 +4 

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	4.30% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
unittests	15.80% <42.10%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[vishesh92]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@vishesh92 a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 10748

[DaanHoogland]

clgtm

[sureshanaparti]

minor comments, otherwise clgtm

[vishesh92]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@vishesh92 a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 10771

[DaanHoogland]

@blueorangutan test

[blueorangutan]

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests

[blueorangutan]

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-11170)
Environment: kvm-ol8 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol8
Total time taken: 51734 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr9567-t11170-kvm-ol8.zip
Smoke tests completed. 132 look OK, 1 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test	Result	Time (s)	Test File
ContextSuite context=TestDeployVM>:setup	Error	0.00	test_vm_life_cycle.py