Skip to content

Add more types to BloomFilterAgg #1023

Description

@mbutrovich

What is the problem the feature request solves?

#987 introduces native BloomFilterAgg with support for LongType, as in Spark 3.4. Spark 3.5+ added support for other integer types, and strings.

Describe the potential solution

For the other integer types, this should be easy to handle with a cast and use the existing put_long bloom filter method to match Spark behavior. For strings, the underlying bloom filter implementation needs a put_bytes method to match Spark's bloom filter behavior.

Additional context

No response

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions