Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
File partitioning for ListingTable - #1141
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Loading
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes#1139.
Rationale for this change
Adding capability to parse file partitioning and prune unnecessary files
What changes are included in this PR?
partition_values: Vec<ScalarValue>toPartitionedFileexecute()record batch result in file format execution plansTableProviderFilterPushDownvalue tosupports_filter_pushdown()to avoid re-evaluation of the partition pruning [1]]What changes are planned in further issues/PRs?
Are there any user-facing changes?
Rename the
ListingOptions.partitionstoListingOptions.table_partition_colsto make it a bit more explicit.[1] re-evaluating the filters on the the partition column would be expensive:
DictionaryArray<uint8>which is pretty cheap.