Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Document SQL literal syntax and escaping - #14934
Merged
Merged
Conversation
alamb
marked this pull request as ready for review
February 28, 2025 12:22
This was referenced Feb 28, 2025
comphead
approved these changes
Feb 28, 2025
alamb
commented
Feb 28, 2025
ContributorAuthor
Thank you for the review @comphead |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Rationale for this change
When we remove the unescaping from
datafusion-cliI think it is important to document how to properly used escaped valuesWhat changes are included in this PR?
Are these changes tested?
I reviewed the changes locally:
Are there any user-facing changes?