Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Remove one copy of ballista datatype serialization code - #1524
Merged
Conversation
alamb
commented
Jan 5, 2022
| ) | ||
| } | ||
| }) | ||
| pb_arrow_type.try_into() |
ContributorAuthor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The other copy of this logic is here: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/blob/master/ballista/rust/core/src/serde/mod.rs#L161-L267 in case you are interested
houqp
approved these changes
Jan 5, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
NA
Rationale for this change
While working on #1523 I noticed that there were two copies of the protobuf --> DataType logic.
Not only does this duplicate effort, it also potentially allows for divergent implementations
What changes are included in this PR?
Remove one copy of the conversion logic and call the other
Are there any user-facing changes?
No