Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add reproducing test cases for stackoverflows - #16787
Conversation
alamb
commented
Jul 15, 2025
cc @gabotechs and @LiaCastaneda |
| const DEPTH: usize = 3000; | ||
| #[tokio::test] | ||
| #[ignore] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe add a comment about why is it ignored?
gabotechs
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do you think there could be a way of replicating this with the SQL path? something like dynamically building a deeply nested SQL statement that produces the same outcome?
There might be some value in showing the community that this is issue is not exclusive to Substrait, it might help gain some traction.
comphead
commented
Jul 18, 2025
I'm just wondering should it be Gist instead? 🤔 |
Thank you for your contribution. Unfortunately, this pull request is stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Please remove the stale label or comment or this will be closed in 7 days. |
Which issue does this PR close?
Rationale for this change
This is a reproducer for #16788. See the issue for more context.
What changes are included in this PR?
An ignored test case that reproduces stack-overflows
Are these changes tested?
N/A
Are there any user-facing changes?
No