Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Clean up expression placement UDF usage in tests - #20272
Merged
Merged
Conversation
alamb
reviewed
Feb 10, 2026
| .with_id(2), | ||
| )); | ||
| let expr_a = Expr::ScalarFunction(ScalarFunction::new_udf( |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think you can make this less verbose via expr_a = udf_a.call(vec![col("user"), lit("field")])
alamb
approved these changes
Feb 10, 2026
alamb
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you -- this looks like a nice improvement to me
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
de-bgunter pushed a commit
to de-bgunter/datafusion
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 24, 2026
Followup to apache#20238 bringing in the shared test UDFs from apache#20239
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Followup to #20238 bringing in the shared test UDFs from #20239