Add NOT IN coverage for integer IN list tests

[alamb]

Which issue does this PR close?

• Part of Further improve performance of IN list evaluation #19241
• part of SQL / slt coverage for IN lists #23307
• Follow on to Add IN list sqllogictest test (and integer type coverage) #23305

Rationale for this change

We are adding SQL-level coverage for the integer IN list specialization paths. #23305 adds the initial integer IN coverage.

This PR adds paired NOT IN coverage so the SLT file also exercises the negated IN list implementation paths while keeping the expected results easy to audit.

What changes are included in this PR?

1. Add paired NOT IN checks for the existing integer IN list queries

Are these changes tested?

Only tests

Are there any user-facing changes?

No

[alamb]

superceded by #23307