[Minor] Reduce code duplication creating ScalarValue::List

[alamb]

Which issue does this PR close?

N/A

Rationale for this change

While working on #3122 I found it quite painful to make ScalarValue::Lists and noticed that all over the code the same code got copy/pasted around

What changes are included in this PR?

1. Add ScalarValue::new_list
2. Remove much duplication

Are there any user-facing changes?

No

[alamb]

The whole PR is just doing this transformation over and over again

[alamb]

Here is the new function

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #3197 (60084cb) into master (929eb6d) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 96.59%.

@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #3197 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 85.87% 85.86% -0.02% 
==========================================
Files 291 291 Lines 52885 52846 -39 ==========================================
- Hits 45415 45375 -40 - Misses 7470 7471 +1 

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
datafusion/sql/src/planner.rs	81.30% <50.00%> (+0.05%)	⬆️
.../physical-expr/src/aggregate/array_agg_distinct.rs	79.41% <89.47%> (-0.78%)	⬇️
datafusion/common/src/scalar.rs	84.65% <100.00%> (-0.10%)	⬇️
...atafusion/physical-expr/src/aggregate/array_agg.rs	95.74% <100.00%> (-0.18%)	⬇️
...sion/physical-expr/src/aggregate/count_distinct.rs	95.00% <100.00%> (-0.04%)	⬇️
...fusion/physical-expr/src/aggregate/sum_distinct.rs	92.72% <100.00%> (ø)
datafusion/physical-expr/src/aggregate/tdigest.rs	91.25% <100.00%> (-0.06%)	⬇️
datafusion/proto/src/lib.rs	93.30% <100.00%> (-0.17%)	⬇️
datafusion/expr/src/window_frame.rs	92.43% <0.00%> (-0.85%)	⬇️
datafusion/expr/src/logical_plan/plan.rs	77.43% <0.00%> (-0.35%)	⬇️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[xudong963]

Great simplify 💯

[alamb]

Thanks for the review @xudong963

[ursabot]

Benchmark runs are scheduled for baseline = 3df9f80 and contender = e0a9fa3. e0a9fa3 is a master commit associated with this PR. Results will be available as each benchmark for each run completes.
Conbench compare runs links:
[Skipped ⚠️ Benchmarking of arrow-datafusion-commits is not supported on ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2] ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2
[Skipped ⚠️ Benchmarking of arrow-datafusion-commits is not supported on test-mac-arm] test-mac-arm
[Skipped ⚠️ Benchmarking of arrow-datafusion-commits is not supported on ursa-i9-9960x] ursa-i9-9960x
[Skipped ⚠️ Benchmarking of arrow-datafusion-commits is not supported on ursa-thinkcentre-m75q] ursa-thinkcentre-m75q
Buildkite builds:
Supported benchmarks:
ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R. Runs only benchmarks with cloud = True
test-mac-arm: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Python, R
ursa-i9-9960x: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R, JavaScript
ursa-thinkcentre-m75q: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Java