Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add to_unoptimized_plan - #3344
Conversation
iajoiner
commented
Sep 2, 2022
cc @andygrove |
| /// Return the logical plan represented by this DataFrame. | ||
| /// Return the raw (i.e. unoptimized) logical plan represented by this DataFrame. | ||
| pub fn to_raw_logical_plan(&self) -> LogicalPlan { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I wonder if a better name would be to_unoptimized_plan?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sure. Do we need to specify that it is a logical as opposed to physical plan in the name?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think so, because the return type is LogicalPlan
codecov-commenter
commented
Sep 2, 2022
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #3344 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 85.49% 85.50% =======================================
Files 294 294 Lines 54060 54064 +4 =======================================
+ Hits 46220 46225 +5 + Misses 7840 7839 -1
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
ursabot
commented
Sep 2, 2022
Benchmark runs are scheduled for baseline = 24db13b and contender = 5bdd55b. 5bdd55b is a master commit associated with this PR. Results will be available as each benchmark for each run completes. |
* Add to_raw_logical_plan * rename the new func * change func name to to_unoptimized_plan
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes#3340.
Rationale for this change
Enable people to fetch the raw
LogicalPlanin aDataFrame.What changes are included in this PR?
pub fn to_raw_logical_plan(&self) -> LogicalPlan {..}has been added together with an assertion in a test.Are there any user-facing changes?
Yes. There are no breaking changes though.