Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[fix](agg) windown_funnel compatibility issue with multi backends - #24385
Conversation
mrhhsg
commented
Sep 14, 2023
run buildall |
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
doris-robot
commented
Sep 14, 2023
TeamCity be ut coverage result: |
doris-robot
commented
Sep 14, 2023
(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result: |
c54b768 to
3bee173Comparemrhhsg
commented
Sep 14, 2023
run buildall |
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
doris-robot
commented
Sep 14, 2023
TeamCity be ut coverage result: |
doris-robot
commented
Sep 14, 2023
(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result: |
yiguolei
commented
Sep 15, 2023
run buildall |
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
doris-robot
commented
Sep 15, 2023
(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result: |
doris-robot
commented
Sep 15, 2023
TeamCity be ut coverage result: |
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
Proposed changes
In a multi backends environment, compatibility issues may arise if the configurations of the BE instances are inconsistent.
Further comments
If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at dev@doris.apache.org by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...