Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[fix](fe) Fix FrontendHbResponse serialization compatibility problem - #30337
Merged
Conversation
* Between branch-1.2-lts and branch-2.1, `FrontendHbResponse` has upgrade compatiblity problem, because `arrowFlightSqlPort` field, only metaVerserion less than FeMetaVersion.VERSION_121 will call `FrontendHbResponse.readField` * Introduced by apache#24314
swjtu-zhanglei
commented
Jan 24, 2024
ContributorAuthor
need pick to branch-2.1 |
swjtu-zhanglei
commented
Jan 24, 2024
ContributorAuthor
run buildall |
gavinchou
approved these changes
Jan 24, 2024
Contributor
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
doris-robot
commented
Jan 24, 2024
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 38572 ms |
doris-robot
commented
Jan 24, 2024
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 186322 ms |
Contributor
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
doris-robot
commented
Jan 24, 2024
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 30.89 s |
doris-robot
commented
Jan 24, 2024
Load test result on machine: 'aliyun_ecs.c7a.8xlarge_32C64G' |
swjtu-zhanglei added a commit
to swjtu-zhanglei/incubator-doris
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2024
* Similar to apache#30337 * Between branch-1.2-lts and branch-2.1, `FrontendHbResponse` has upgrade compatiblity problem, because `arrowFlightSqlPort` field, only metaVerserion less than FeMetaVersion.VERSION_121 will call `BackendHbResponse.readField` * Introduced by apache#24314
swjtu-zhanglei added a commit
to swjtu-zhanglei/incubator-doris
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2024
* Similar to apache#30337 * Between branch-1.2-lts and branch-2.1, `FrontendHbResponse` has upgrade compatiblity problem, because `arrowFlightSqlPort` field, only metaVerserion less than FeMetaVersion.VERSION_121 will call `BackendHbResponse.readField` * Introduced by apache#24314
HappenLee pushed a commit
to HappenLee/incubator-doris
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2026
apache#30337) * Between branch-1.2-lts and branch-2.1, `FrontendHbResponse` has upgrade compatiblity problem, because `arrowFlightSqlPort` field, only metaVerserion less than FeMetaVersion.VERSION_121 will call `FrontendHbResponse.readField` * Introduced by apache#24314
HappenLee pushed a commit
to HappenLee/incubator-doris
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2026
…apache#30433) * Similar to apache#30337 * Between branch-1.2-lts and branch-2.1, `FrontendHbResponse` has upgrade compatiblity problem, because `arrowFlightSqlPort` field, only metaVerserion less than FeMetaVersion.VERSION_121 will call `BackendHbResponse.readField` * Introduced by apache#24314
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Between branch-1.2-lts and branch-2.1,
FrontendHbResponsehas upgrade compatiblity problem, becausearrowFlightSqlPortfield, only metaVerserion less than FeMetaVersion.VERSION_121 will callFrontendHbResponse.readFieldIntroduced by [feature-wip](arrow-flight)(step2) FE support Arrow Flight server #24314
Proposed changes
Issue Number: close #xxx
Further comments
If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at dev@doris.apache.org by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...