Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[fix](Nereids) unix_timestamp compute signature and fold const is wrong - #35727
Merged
Conversation
doris-robot
commented
May 31, 2024
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Since 2024-03-18, the Document has been moved to doris-website. |
morrySnow
commented
May 31, 2024
ContributorAuthor
run buildall |
doris-robot
commented
May 31, 2024
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 41754 ms |
doris-robot
commented
May 31, 2024
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 171730 ms |
doris-robot
commented
May 31, 2024
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 30.53 s |
morrySnow
commented
May 31, 2024
ContributorAuthor
run cloud_p1 |
morrySnowforce-pushed
the
fix_unix_timestamp
branch
from
May 31, 2024 11:34
4fe7a51 to
83acb92ComparemorrySnow
commented
May 31, 2024
ContributorAuthor
run buildall |
doris-robot
commented
May 31, 2024
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 41717 ms |
doris-robot
commented
May 31, 2024
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 169479 ms |
doris-robot
commented
May 31, 2024
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 30.75 s |
morrySnow
commented
May 31, 2024
ContributorAuthor
run feut |
Contributor
jshell> Integer.parseInt("3.14159")
| 异常错误java.lang.NumberFormatException:Forinputstring: "3.14159"
| atNumberFormatException.forInputString (NumberFormatException.java:67)
| atInteger.parseInt (Integer.java:668)
| atInteger.parseInt (Integer.java:786)
| at (#1:1) |
yiguolei
previously approved these changes
Jun 3, 2024
morrySnowforce-pushed
the
fix_unix_timestamp
branch
from
June 3, 2024 03:32
83acb92 to
b8acd12ComparemorrySnow
commented
Jun 3, 2024
ContributorAuthor
run buildall |
doris-robot
commented
Jun 3, 2024
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 40549 ms |
doris-robot
commented
Jun 3, 2024
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 170895 ms |
morrySnow
commented
Jun 3, 2024
ContributorAuthor
run feut |
doris-robot
commented
Jun 3, 2024
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 30.46 s |
yiguolei
previously approved these changes
Jun 3, 2024
Contributor
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
Contributor
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
924060929
previously approved these changes
Jun 3, 2024
1. compute signature should call super#computeSignature first 2. fold const return type not changed after signature changed in apache#26827
morrySnowforce-pushed
the
fix_unix_timestamp
branch
from
June 3, 2024 06:40
b8acd12 to
95ab9ceComparemorrySnow
commented
Jun 3, 2024
ContributorAuthor
run buildall |
doris-robot
commented
Jun 3, 2024
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 40781 ms |
doris-robot
commented
Jun 3, 2024
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 169436 ms |
doris-robot
commented
Jun 3, 2024
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 30.62 s |
yiguolei
approved these changes
Jun 3, 2024
924060929
approved these changes
Jun 3, 2024
Contributor
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
seawinde pushed a commit
to seawinde/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2024
…ng (apache#35727) 1. compute signature should call super#computeSignature first 2. fold const return type not changed after signature changed in apache#26827 we already have p0 for this case, but our regression framework has bug that it report success when compare decimal type if real result lose scale
HappenLee pushed a commit
to HappenLee/incubator-doris
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2026
…ng (apache#35727) 1. compute signature should call super#computeSignature first 2. fold const return type not changed after signature changed in apache#26827 we already have p0 for this case, but our regression framework has bug that it report success when compare decimal type if real result lose scale
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
we already have p0 for this case, but our regression framework has bug
that it report success when compare decimal type if real result lose scale