Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[fix](move-memtable) multi replica tables should tolerate minority failures - #38003
Merged
Conversation
doris-robot
commented
Jul 17, 2024
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Since 2024-03-18, the Document has been moved to doris-website. |
kaijchen
marked this pull request as draft
July 17, 2024 09:12
kaijchen
commented
Jul 17, 2024
MemberAuthor
run buildall |
Contributor
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
doris-robot
commented
Jul 17, 2024
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 39987 ms |
kaijchen
commented
Jul 17, 2024
MemberAuthor
run buildall |
Contributor
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
doris-robot
commented
Jul 17, 2024
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 40164 ms |
doris-robot
commented
Jul 17, 2024
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 173918 ms |
doris-robot
commented
Jul 17, 2024
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 30.55 s |
kaijchen
commented
Jul 18, 2024
MemberAuthor
run buildall |
Contributor
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
doris-robot
commented
Jul 18, 2024
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 39787 ms |
doris-robot
commented
Jul 18, 2024
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 173924 ms |
doris-robot
commented
Jul 18, 2024
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 30.63 s |
kaijchen
commented
Jul 19, 2024
MemberAuthor
run buildall |
Contributor
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
doris-robot
commented
Jul 19, 2024
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 39944 ms |
doris-robot
commented
Jul 19, 2024
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 173034 ms |
doris-robot
commented
Jul 19, 2024
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 30.69 s |
kaijchen
commented
Jul 31, 2024
MemberAuthor
run buildall |
kaijchen
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 31, 2024 08:54
kaijchen
commented
Jul 31, 2024
MemberAuthor
run buildall |
Contributor
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
1 similar comment
Contributor
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
Contributor
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
Contributor
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
dataroaring pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 11, 2024
…ilures (#38003) Load job for multi replica tables shouldn't fail immediately on any single replica errors. Errors should be recorded and reported for individual replica of tablets, and checked on commit info.
wyxxxcat pushed a commit
to wyxxxcat/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 14, 2024
…ilures (apache#38003) Load job for multi replica tables shouldn't fail immediately on any single replica errors. Errors should be recorded and reported for individual replica of tablets, and checked on commit info.
dataroaring pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2024
…ilures (#38003) Load job for multi replica tables shouldn't fail immediately on any single replica errors. Errors should be recorded and reported for individual replica of tablets, and checked on commit info.
kaijchen added a commit
to kaijchen/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 6, 2024
…ilures (apache#38003) Load job for multi replica tables shouldn't fail immediately on any single replica errors. Errors should be recorded and reported for individual replica of tablets, and checked on commit info.
yiguolei pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 9, 2024
Closed
Closed
16 tasks
liaoxin01 pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2024
…44344) Problem Summary: #38003 introduced a problem where the last sink node could report success even when close wait timeout, which may cause data loss. Previously we made that change hoping to tolerate minority replica failure in this step. However, it turns out the last sink node could miss tablet reports from downstreams in case of close wait failure. This PR fixes the problem by return the close_wait error immediately. The most common error in close wait is timeout, and it should not be fault tolerant on a replica basis anyways.
github-actionsBot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2024
…44344) Problem Summary: #38003 introduced a problem where the last sink node could report success even when close wait timeout, which may cause data loss. Previously we made that change hoping to tolerate minority replica failure in this step. However, it turns out the last sink node could miss tablet reports from downstreams in case of close wait failure. This PR fixes the problem by return the close_wait error immediately. The most common error in close wait is timeout, and it should not be fault tolerant on a replica basis anyways.
github-actionsBot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2024
…44344) Problem Summary: #38003 introduced a problem where the last sink node could report success even when close wait timeout, which may cause data loss. Previously we made that change hoping to tolerate minority replica failure in this step. However, it turns out the last sink node could miss tablet reports from downstreams in case of close wait failure. This PR fixes the problem by return the close_wait error immediately. The most common error in close wait is timeout, and it should not be fault tolerant on a replica basis anyways.
csun5285 pushed a commit
to csun5285/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 22, 2024
…pache#44344) Problem Summary: apache#38003 introduced a problem where the last sink node could report success even when close wait timeout, which may cause data loss. Previously we made that change hoping to tolerate minority replica failure in this step. However, it turns out the last sink node could miss tablet reports from downstreams in case of close wait failure. This PR fixes the problem by return the close_wait error immediately. The most common error in close wait is timeout, and it should not be fault tolerant on a replica basis anyways.
morningman pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2024
…44344) Problem Summary: #38003 introduced a problem where the last sink node could report success even when close wait timeout, which may cause data loss. Previously we made that change hoping to tolerate minority replica failure in this step. However, it turns out the last sink node could miss tablet reports from downstreams in case of close wait failure. This PR fixes the problem by return the close_wait error immediately. The most common error in close wait is timeout, and it should not be fault tolerant on a replica basis anyways.
yiguolei pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2024
…44344) Problem Summary: #38003 introduced a problem where the last sink node could report success even when close wait timeout, which may cause data loss. Previously we made that change hoping to tolerate minority replica failure in this step. However, it turns out the last sink node could miss tablet reports from downstreams in case of close wait failure. This PR fixes the problem by return the close_wait error immediately. The most common error in close wait is timeout, and it should not be fault tolerant on a replica basis anyways.
Closed
HappenLee pushed a commit
to HappenLee/incubator-doris
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2026
…ilures (apache#38003) Load job for multi replica tables shouldn't fail immediately on any single replica errors. Errors should be recorded and reported for individual replica of tablets, and checked on commit info.
HappenLee pushed a commit
to HappenLee/incubator-doris
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2026
…pache#44344) Problem Summary: apache#38003 introduced a problem where the last sink node could report success even when close wait timeout, which may cause data loss. Previously we made that change hoping to tolerate minority replica failure in this step. However, it turns out the last sink node could miss tablet reports from downstreams in case of close wait failure. This PR fixes the problem by return the close_wait error immediately. The most common error in close wait is timeout, and it should not be fault tolerant on a replica basis anyways.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed changes
Load job for multi replica tables shouldn't fail immediately on any single replica errors.
Errors should be recorded and reported for individual replica of tablets, and checked on commit info.