Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[Improvement](inverted index) lazy init inverted index file reader - #38979
Merged
Conversation
doris-robot
commented
Aug 6, 2024
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Since 2024-03-18, the Document has been moved to doris-website. |
airborne12
commented
Aug 6, 2024
MemberAuthor
run buildall |
Contributor
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
doris-robot
commented
Aug 6, 2024
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 41544 ms |
doris-robot
commented
Aug 6, 2024
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 169779 ms |
doris-robot
commented
Aug 6, 2024
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 29.96 s |
airborne12
commented
Aug 6, 2024
MemberAuthor
run buildall |
Contributor
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
doris-robot
commented
Aug 6, 2024
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 41302 ms |
doris-robot
commented
Aug 6, 2024
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 168034 ms |
doris-robot
commented
Aug 6, 2024
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 29.85 s |
airborne12
commented
Aug 7, 2024
MemberAuthor
run buildall |
Contributor
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
airborne12
commented
Aug 7, 2024
MemberAuthor
run buildall |
Contributor
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
Contributor
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
Contributor
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
doris-robot
commented
Aug 7, 2024
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 41223 ms |
doris-robot
commented
Aug 7, 2024
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 168581 ms |
doris-robot
commented
Aug 7, 2024
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 29.99 s |
dataroaring pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 11, 2024
…38979) ## Proposed changes We call InvertedIndexFileReader::init in segment_iterator init_inverted_index_iterators now, which cause searcher cache miss. So we lazy init when we open specific index.
wyxxxcat pushed a commit
to wyxxxcat/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 14, 2024
…pache#38979) ## Proposed changes We call InvertedIndexFileReader::init in segment_iterator init_inverted_index_iterators now, which cause searcher cache miss. So we lazy init when we open specific index.
dataroaring pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2024
…38979) ## Proposed changes We call InvertedIndexFileReader::init in segment_iterator init_inverted_index_iterators now, which cause searcher cache miss. So we lazy init when we open specific index.
Closed
HappenLee pushed a commit
to HappenLee/incubator-doris
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2026
…pache#38979) ## Proposed changes We call InvertedIndexFileReader::init in segment_iterator init_inverted_index_iterators now, which cause searcher cache miss. So we lazy init when we open specific index.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed changes
We call InvertedIndexFileReader::init in segment_iterator init_inverted_index_iterators now, which cause searcher cache miss.
So we lazy init when we open specific index.