Skip to content

[fix](runtime) Avoid merging results into one large result in BufferControlBlock - #49571

Merged
yiguolei merged 1 commit into
apache:branch-2.1from
mrhhsg:fix_merge
Mar 27, 2025
Merged

[fix](runtime) Avoid merging results into one large result in BufferControlBlock#49571
yiguolei merged 1 commit into
apache:branch-2.1from
mrhhsg:fix_merge

Conversation

@mrhhsg

@mrhhsgmrhhsg commented Mar 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:

Release note

None

Check List (For Author)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No code files have been changed.
      • Other reason

  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.

  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

@mrhhsg
mrhhsg requested a review from yiguolei as a code ownerMarch 27, 2025 06:39
@hello-stephen

hello-stephen commented Mar 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@mrhhsg

mrhhsg commented Mar 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

run buildall

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Mar 27, 2025
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Mar 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Mar 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

@hello-stephen

hello-stephen commented Mar 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

BE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 0.00% (0/6) 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

CategoryCoverage
Function Coverage37.40% (9852/26344)
Line Coverage29.09% (82557/283783)
Region Coverage27.70% (42348/152863)
Branch Coverage24.45% (21553/88166)

@yiguolei
yiguolei merged commit 11f8b53 into apache:branch-2.1Mar 27, 2025
mrhhsg added a commit to mrhhsg/doris that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2025
@mrhhsg
[fix](runtime) Avoid merging results into one large result in BufferC…
1af4b45
…ontrolBlock (apache#49571)
@mrhhsgmrhhsg mentioned this pull request Mar 28, 2025
Merged
16 tasks
yiguolei pushed a commit to mrhhsg/doris that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2025
@mrhhsg@yiguolei
[fix](runtime) Avoid merging results into one large result in BufferC…
cb73029
…ontrolBlock (apache#49571)
yiguolei pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2025
@mrhhsg
[fix](runtime) Avoid merging results into one large result in BufferC…
2891f80
…ontrolBlock (#49571) (#49639)
### What problem does this PR solve?
Pick #37990 and #49571
Related PR: #xxx
Problem Summary:
### Release note
None
### Check List (For Author)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [ ] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No code files have been changed.
- [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
apache/doris-website#1214 -->
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@yiguoleiyiguoleiyiguolei approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

approvedIndicates a PR has been approved by one committer.dev/2.1.10-mergednot-merge/3.0not-merge/3.1reviewed

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@mrhhsg@hello-stephen@yiguolei@morrySnow