Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[fix](inverted index) fix query error - #50860
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Thearas
commented
May 13, 2025
Contributor
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Please clearly describe your PR:
|
csun5285
commented
May 13, 2025
ContributorAuthor
run buildall |
Contributor
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
doris-robot
commented
May 13, 2025
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 33645 ms |
doris-robot
commented
May 13, 2025
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 186791 ms |
doris-robot
commented
May 13, 2025
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 28.96 s |
Contributor
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
doris-robot
commented
May 13, 2025
BE UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage Increment coverage report
|
hello-stephen
commented
May 13, 2025
Contributor
BE Regression && UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage Increment coverage report
|
github-actionsBot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2025
When the IN predicate in an expression contains parameters generated through CAST operations, utilizing inverted indexes may produce erroneous query results.
github-actionsBot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2025
When the IN predicate in an expression contains parameters generated through CAST operations, utilizing inverted indexes may produce erroneous query results.
dataroaring pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2025
csun5285 added a commit
to csun5285/doris
that referenced
this pull request
May 14, 2025
When the IN predicate in an expression contains parameters generated through CAST operations, utilizing inverted indexes may produce erroneous query results.
yiguolei pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2025
koarz pushed a commit
to koarz/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 4, 2025
When the IN predicate in an expression contains parameters generated through CAST operations, utilizing inverted indexes may produce erroneous query results.
Closed
csun5285 added a commit
to csun5285/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2025
When the IN predicate in an expression contains parameters generated through CAST operations, utilizing inverted indexes may produce erroneous query results.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What problem does this PR solve?
When the IN predicate in an expression contains parameters generated through CAST operations, utilizing inverted indexes may produce erroneous query results.
Release note
None
Check List (For Author)
Test
Behavior changed:
Does this need documentation?
Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)