[fix](join) Should not use the build block's size to resize mark_join_flags (#50993)

[mrhhsg]

Pick #50993

Introduced by #51050

The build block maybe be clear_column_mem_not_keep in build phase when the operator is closed.

Status HashJoinBuildSinkLocalState::close(RuntimeState* state, Status exec_status) {
if (_closed) {
returnStatus::OK();
}
auto& p = _parent->cast<HashJoinBuildSinkOperatorX>();
Defer defer {[&]() {
if (!_should_build_hash_table) {
return;
}
// The build side hash key column maybe no need output, but we need to keep the column in block// because it is used to compare with probe side hash key columnif (p._should_keep_hash_key_column && _build_col_ids.size() == 1) {
p._should_keep_column_flags[_build_col_ids[0]] = true;
}
if (_shared_state->build_block) {
// release the memory of unused column in probe stage
_shared_state->build_block->clear_column_mem_not_keep(p._should_keep_column_flags,
p._use_shared_hash_table);
}
if (p._use_shared_hash_table) {
std::unique_lock lock(p._mutex);
p._signaled = true;
for (auto& dep : _shared_state->sink_deps) {
dep->set_ready();
}
for (auto& dep : p._finish_dependencies) {
dep->set_ready();
}
}
}};

*** Aborted at 1747343165 (unix time) try "date -d @1747343165" if you are using GNU date ***
*** Current BE git commitID: e7a3e78b97 ***
*** SIGSEGV address not mapped to object (@0x1) received by PID 7474 (TID 9641 OR 0x7f3f8c0e5640) from PID 1; stack trace: ***
0# doris::signal::(anonymous namespace)::FailureSignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*) at /root/doris/be/src/common/signal_handler.h:421
1# PosixSignals::chained_handler(int, siginfo*, void*) [clone .part.0] in /usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk-amd64/lib/server/libjvm.so
2# JVM_handle_linux_signal in /usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk-amd64/lib/server/libjvm.so
3# 0x00007F4368F76520 in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
4# doris::Status doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<7>::finish_probing > > >(doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed > >&, doris::vectorized::MutableBlock&, doris::vectorized::Block*, bool*, bool) at /root/doris/be/src/pipeline/exec/join/process_hash_table_probe_impl.h:738
5# std::__detail::__variant::__gen_vtable_impl (*)(doris::pipeline::HashJoinProbeOperatorX::pull(doris::RuntimeState*, doris::vectorized::Block*, bool*) const::$_1&&, std::variant > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber, doris::JoinHashTable, HashCRC32 > > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber, doris::JoinHashTable, HashCRC32 > > >, doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed > >, doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed, HashCRC32 > > >, doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed > >, doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed, HashCRC32 > > >, doris::vectorized::MethodStringNoCache > > >&, std::variant, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<2>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<8>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<1>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<4>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<3>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<7>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<9>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<10>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<11> >&)>, std::integer_sequence >::__visit_invoke(doris::pipeline::HashJoinProbeOperatorX::pull(doris::RuntimeState*, doris::vectorized::Block*, bool*) const::$_1&&, std::variant > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber, doris::JoinHashTable, HashCRC32 > > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber, doris::JoinHashTable, HashCRC32 > > >, doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed > >, doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed, HashCRC32 > > >, doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed > >, doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed, HashCRC32 > > >, doris::vectorized::MethodStringNoCache > > >&, std::variant, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<2>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<8>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<1>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<4>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<3>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<7>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<9>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<10>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<11> >&) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/variant:1013
6# doris::pipeline::HashJoinProbeOperatorX::pull(doris::RuntimeState*, doris::vectorized::Block*, bool*) const at /root/doris/be/src/pipeline/exec/hashjoin_probe_operator.cpp:281
7# doris::pipeline::StatefulOperatorX::get_block(doris::RuntimeState*, doris::vectorized::Block*, bool*) at /root/doris/be/src/pipeline/exec/operator.cpp:670
8# doris::pipeline::OperatorXBase::get_block_after_projects(doris::RuntimeState*, doris::vectorized::Block*, bool*) at /root/doris/be/src/pipeline/exec/operator.cpp:381
9# doris::pipeline::PipelineTask::execute(bool*) in /mnt/hdd01/ci/doris-deploy-master-local/be/lib/doris_be
10# doris::pipeline::TaskScheduler::_do_work(int) at /root/doris/be/src/pipeline/task_scheduler.cpp:144
11# doris::ThreadPool::dispatch_thread() at /root/doris/be/src/util/threadpool.cpp:622
12# doris::Thread::supervise_thread(void*) at /root/doris/be/src/util/thread.cpp:469
13# start_thread at ./nptl/pthread_create.c:442
14# 0x00007F436905A850 at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone3.S:83

Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:

None

• Test

  • Regression test
  • Unit Test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:

• This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
  - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason

• Behavior changed:

  • No.
  • Yes.

• Does this need documentation?

  • No.

• Yes.

• Confirm the release note

• Confirm test cases

• Confirm document

• Add branch pick label

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:

Release note

None

Check List (For Author)

• Test

  • Regression test
  • Unit Test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
    • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
    • Previous test can cover this change.
    • No code files have been changed.
    • Other reason

• Behavior changed:

  • No.
  • Yes.

• Does this need documentation?

  • No.
  • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

• Confirm the release note
• Confirm test cases
• Confirm document
• Add branch pick label

[Thearas]

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

[mrhhsg]

run buildall

[doris-robot]

BE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 0.00% (0/9) 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Category	Coverage
Function Coverage	39.03% (10323/26449)
Line Coverage	30.05% (85780/285501)
Region Coverage	28.71% (44251/154121)
Branch Coverage	25.44% (22646/89010)

[hello-stephen]

BE Regression && UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 100.00% (9/9) 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Category	Coverage
Function Coverage	74.56% (19425/26054)
Line Coverage	69.30% (196595/283697)
Region Coverage	66.90% (120036/179433)
Branch Coverage	59.91% (60311/100666)