Skip to content

[fix](decimal256) fix casting float/double to decimal256 - #54402

Merged
yiguolei merged 2 commits into
apache:branch-2.1from
jacktengg:2.1-fix-cast-float-to-decimal256
Aug 7, 2025
Merged

[fix](decimal256) fix casting float/double to decimal256#54402
yiguolei merged 2 commits into
apache:branch-2.1from
jacktengg:2.1-fix-cast-float-to-decimal256

Conversation

@jacktengg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:

Release note

None

Check List (For Author)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No code files have been changed.
      • Other reason
  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.
  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

@jacktengg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

run buildall

@hello-stephen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@hello-stephen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

BE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 0.00% (0/7) 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

CategoryCoverage
Function Coverage39.10% (10350/26471)
Line Coverage30.10% (86036/285865)
Region Coverage28.81% (44464/154322)
Branch Coverage25.52% (22758/89162)

@jacktengg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

run buildall

@doris-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

BE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 0.00% (0/7) 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

CategoryCoverage
Function Coverage39.10% (10350/26471)
Line Coverage30.10% (86055/285865)
Region Coverage28.81% (44456/154322)
Branch Coverage25.52% (22755/89162)

zclllyybb pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2025
### What problem does this PR solve?
This problem is already fixed on master by the refactoring PR #50940
Related PR:
3.0: #54400
2.1: #54402
@yiguolei
yiguolei merged commit dcef9ee into apache:branch-2.1Aug 7, 2025
19 of 20 checks passed
@yiguoleiyiguolei added dev/2.1.11-merged usercase Important user case type label labels Aug 7, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dev/2.1.11-mergedusercaseImportant user case type label

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@jacktengg@hello-stephen@doris-robot@yiguolei