Skip to content

branch-4.0:[fix](mtmv) Fix nested mv rewritten fail when bottom mv is partitioned (#57558) - #58277

Merged
yiguolei merged 1 commit into
apache:branch-4.0from
seawinde:fix_nest_partition_mv_rewrite_fail_40
Nov 25, 2025
Merged

branch-4.0:[fix](mtmv) Fix nested mv rewritten fail when bottom mv is partitioned (#57558)#58277
yiguolei merged 1 commit into
apache:branch-4.0from
seawinde:fix_nest_partition_mv_rewrite_fail_40

Conversation

@seawinde

@seawindeseawinde commented Nov 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

pr: #57558
commitId: 5e43141

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:

Release note

None

Check List (For Author)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No code files have been changed.
      • Other reason

  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.

  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

@seawinde
[fix](mtmv) Fix nested mv rewritten fail when bottom mv is partitioned (
7619a33
apache#57558)
Related PR: apache#49514apache#56958 Problem Summary:
In the scenario of nested materialized view rewriting, if the underlying
materialized view is a partitioned materialized view, the rewriting of
the upper-level materialized view would fail. This PR fixes the issue.
@hello-stephen

hello-stephen commented Nov 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@seawinde

seawinde commented Nov 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

run buildall

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Nov 25, 2025
@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Nov 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

@github-actions

github-actionsBot commented Nov 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

@yiguolei
yiguolei merged commit 0cb509d into apache:branch-4.0Nov 25, 2025
25 of 27 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@yiguoleiyiguoleiyiguolei approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

approvedIndicates a PR has been approved by one committer.reviewed

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@seawinde@hello-stephen@yiguolei