Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
branch-4.0: [fix](be) Fix json contains duplicate array candidates #63301 - #63338
Merged
Conversation
hello-stephen
commented
May 18, 2026
Contributor
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Please clearly describe your PR:
|
hello-stephen
commented
May 18, 2026
Contributor
run buildall |
morningman
approved these changes
Jun 24, 2026
ContributorAuthor
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
ContributorAuthor
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
Problem Summary: `json_contains('[1,1,1]', '[1,1]')` should return true,
but the previous JSONB array containment logic counted matching target
elements and compared that count with the candidate array length.
Duplicate candidate elements therefore produced incorrect false results.
This change checks each candidate array element independently against
the target array, matching non-consuming containment semantics.
### Release note
Fix `json_contains` returning false when the candidate array contains
duplicate elements already present in the target array.
### Check List (For Author)
- Test: Unit Test
- `./run-be-ut.sh --run --filter=JsonbContainsTest.* -j 32`
- `build-support/check-format.sh`
- `git diff --check 66dbb85..HEAD`
- `build-support/run-clang-tidy.sh --build-dir be/ut_build_ASAN` (failed
because clang-tidy could not analyze existing headers in this
environment: `be/src/core/types.h` has an unmatched `NOLINTEND`, and the
toolchain could not resolve `stddef.h`/intrinsic headers)
- Behavior changed: Yes
- `json_contains` now follows non-consuming array containment semantics
for duplicate candidate elements.
- Does this need documentation: Nomorningmanforce-pushed
the
auto-pick-63301-branch-4.0
branch
from
June 24, 2026 09:53
8786ecd to
0947acbComparemorningman
commented
Jun 24, 2026
Contributor
run buildall |
morningman
previously approved these changes
Jun 24, 2026
fix include error
mrhhsg
commented
Jun 24, 2026
Member
run buildall |
hello-stephen
commented
Jun 24, 2026
Contributor
BE UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage Increment coverage report
|
hello-stephen
commented
Jun 24, 2026
Contributor
BE Regression && UT Coverage ReportIncrement line coverage Increment coverage report
|
morningman
approved these changes
Jun 25, 2026
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Cherry-picked from #63301