[fix](fe) block inverted index V1 creation in FE by LIANG751234313 · Pull Request #64522 · apache/doris

LIANG751234313 · 2026-06-15T08:11:53Z

What problem does this PR solve?

Problem Summary:

When users copy historical DDL statements that explicitly set inverted index format to V1, new tables are silently created with V1. Inverted index V1 does not support small file merging and bypasses the packed file path, significantly amplifying PUT requests to object storage.

Observed impact: clusters with high write QPS are seeing300–400 PUT/s, with 70–80% attributed to inverted index V1.
Block new inverted index V1 creation at the FE level:

Explicitly specifying inverted_index_storage_format = v1 on a new indexnow returns an error immediately.
Users are guided to use V2 (the default).
Existing V1 tables remain fully compatible — metadata loading and read/write
are unaffected. No forced migration.

Error message:Inverted index V1 is deprecated and no longer allowed for new index creation.Please use inverted index V2.
Coverage

CREATE TABLE with inline index definition
ALTER TABLE ADD INDEX
All other code paths that create a new inverted index

Release note

Check List (For Author)

Test
- Regression test
  Added regression-test/suites/inverted_index_p0/storage_format/test_inverted_index_v1_deprecated.groovy
- Unit Test
  fe/fe-core/src/main/java/org/apache/doris/common/util/PropertyAnalyzer.java
- Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
  - This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
  - Previous test can cover this change.
  - No code files have been changed.
  - Other reason
Behavior changed:
- No.
- Yes.
Does this need documentation?
- No.
- Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

Confirm the release note
Confirm test cases
Confirm document
Add branch pick label

hello-stephen · 2026-06-15T08:11:58Z

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
What features were added. Why was this function added?
Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

airborne12

LGTM

airborne12 · 2026-06-17T03:57:29Z

run buildall

airborne12 · 2026-06-17T03:57:35Z

/review

github-actions · 2026-06-17T03:58:13Z

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

github-actions · 2026-06-17T03:58:16Z

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

github-actions

I am requesting changes. The analyzer now rejects an explicit inverted_index_storage_format = v1, but it does not yet block all new V1 creation paths, and the regression coverage around V1 is incomplete.

Critical checkpoint conclusions:

Goal/test proof: partially satisfied only for explicit V1 table properties. New V1 creation remains possible through the default/config path, and compatibility coverage is not deterministic.
Scope/focus: the code change is small, but related test updates are incomplete because existing V1 regression suites are left failing or inconsistent with the new policy.
Concurrency/lifecycle: not involved in this PR.
Config: involved. Config.inverted_index_storage_format is mutable and can still drive new V1 table/index creation.
Compatibility: legacy metadata loading appears to stay on TableProperty rather than this analyzer, but read/write compatibility for existing V1 is not actually proven by the new regression block.
Parallel paths: create-table default/config paths and existing regression V1 setup paths need to be handled.
Tests: explicit rejection is covered, but the unit test does not assert the exception message, the AC4 block can pass after real failures, and existing p0 suites still create V1 tables.
Observability, transactions, persistence, FE-BE protocol: no new concerns found for this scoped FE analyzer change.
User focus: no additional user-provided focus points were supplied.

hello-stephen · 2026-06-17T04:48:53Z

TPC-H: Total hot run time: 28871 ms

machine: 'aliyun_ecs.c7a.8xlarge_32C64G'
scripts: https://github.com/apache/doris/tree/master/tools/tpch-tools
Tpch sf100 test result on commit 85d2b3ba47d50ef9eaad4ea83165d00f03ddca88, data reload: false
------ Round 1 ----------------------------------
============================================
q1	17643	3975	3975	3975
q2	2098	306	187	187
q3	10296	1368	795	795
q4	4682	460	332	332
q5	7510	846	577	577
q6	183	164	133	133
q7	763	820	612	612
q8	9628	1526	1649	1526
q9	6577	4476	4469	4469
q10	6798	1784	1515	1515
q11	461	265	240	240
q12	662	417	291	291
q13	18187	3356	2829	2829
q14	272	252	245	245
q15	q16	786	772	706	706
q17	1235	1137	983	983
q18	6783	5707	5584	5584
q19	1352	1295	1069	1069
q20	483	403	267	267
q21	5641	2582	2243	2243
q22	432	354	293	293
Total cold run time: 102472 ms
Total hot run time: 28871 ms
----- Round 2, with runtime_filter_mode=off -----
============================================
q1	4341	4260	4267	4260
q2	329	354	224	224
q3	4605	4979	4359	4359
q4	2043	2151	1374	1374
q5	4398	4244	4326	4244
q6	226	175	124	124
q7	1720	1621	1980	1621
q8	2504	2138	2126	2126
q9	7900	7915	7907	7907
q10	4768	4757	4332	4332
q11	622	431	375	375
q12	729	750	528	528
q13	3350	3663	3006	3006
q14	304	315	275	275
q15	q16	709	722	658	658
q17	1381	1337	1334	1334
q18	7974	7307	7227	7227
q19	1096	1126	1093	1093
q20	2228	2219	1950	1950
q21	5230	4540	4454	4454
q22	512	445	416	416
Total cold run time: 56969 ms
Total hot run time: 51887 ms

hello-stephen · 2026-06-17T05:00:09Z

TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 175335 ms

machine: 'aliyun_ecs.c7a.8xlarge_32C64G'
scripts: https://github.com/apache/doris/tree/master/tools/tpcds-tools
TPC-DS sf100 test result on commit 85d2b3ba47d50ef9eaad4ea83165d00f03ddca88, data reload: false
query5	4327	635	472	472
query6	468	192	177	177
query7	4837	567	300	300
query8	366	216	205	205
query9	8758	4061	4041	4041
query10	432	309	280	280
query11	5823	2312	2115	2115
query12	156	102	98	98
query13	1263	642	441	441
query14	6383	5357	5051	5051
query14_1	4422	4379	4373	4373
query15	204	196	176	176
query16	1012	436	419	419
query17	1128	675	539	539
query18	2446	489	330	330
query19	187	172	144	144
query20	115	105	106	105
query21	214	135	123	123
query22	13543	13673	13318	13318
query23	17418	16523	16138	16138
query23_1	16269	16319	16227	16227
query24	7582	1760	1302	1302
query24_1	1307	1295	1283	1283
query25	545	435	362	362
query26	1323	327	161	161
query27	2670	575	327	327
query28	4518	2097	2068	2068
query29	1045	590	478	478
query30	313	231	200	200
query31	1161	1095	971	971
query32	108	62	58	58
query33	506	335	246	246
query34	1202	1213	695	695
query35	767	782	688	688
query36	1457	1423	1248	1248
query37	154	108	96	96
query38	3234	3161	3047	3047
query39	928	931	898	898
query39_1	884	880	887	880
query40	219	128	103	103
query41	70	71	66	66
query42	97	97	94	94
query43	322	323	280	280
query44	1428	793	799	793
query45	199	190	179	179
query46	1078	1244	749	749
query47	2464	2340	2258	2258
query48	417	441	315	315
query49	652	488	366	366
query50	1020	361	267	267
query51	4342	4268	4230	4230
query52	92	90	78	78
query53	249	270	194	194
query54	293	224	206	206
query55	80	82	75	75
query56	241	232	228	228
query57	1451	1442	1329	1329
query58	255	224	214	214
query59	1604	1662	1446	1446
query60	294	255	239	239
query61	178	173	172	172
query62	714	657	585	585
query63	241	191	197	191
query64	2578	748	583	583
query65	4846	4795	4793	4793
query66	1784	457	332	332
query67	29658	29607	29473	29473
query68	3261	1575	985	985
query69	408	313	267	267
query70	1076	979	930	930
query71	302	230	207	207
query72	2882	2636	2285	2285
query73	830	793	448	448
query74	5103	4981	4781	4781
query75	2653	2609	2237	2237
query76	2347	1175	823	823
query77	372	377	282	282
query78	12361	12487	11932	11932
query79	1452	1205	787	787
query80	1280	489	388	388
query81	521	289	240	240
query82	661	154	118	118
query83	312	268	250	250
query84	260	147	110	110
query85	916	517	411	411
query86	433	304	285	285
query87	3423	3349	3174	3174
query88	3714	2828	2780	2780
query89	422	389	337	337
query90	1902	193	177	177
query91	172	166	134	134
query92	63	62	57	57
query93	1577	1541	898	898
query94	714	327	265	265
query95	668	380	451	380
query96	1070	787	341	341
query97	2697	2716	2584	2584
query98	214	207	198	198
query99	1182	1172	1038	1038
Total cold run time: 261989 ms
Total hot run time: 175335 ms

hello-stephen · 2026-06-17T05:05:10Z

ClickBench: Total hot run time: 25.27 s

machine: 'aliyun_ecs.c7a.8xlarge_32C64G'
scripts: https://github.com/apache/doris/tree/master/tools/clickbench-tools
ClickBench test result on commit 85d2b3ba47d50ef9eaad4ea83165d00f03ddca88, data reload: false
query1	0.00	0.00	0.00
query2	0.10	0.05	0.05
query3	0.26	0.14	0.13
query4	1.60	0.14	0.12
query5	0.25	0.24	0.23
query6	1.23	1.05	1.04
query7	0.07	0.01	0.00
query8	0.05	0.04	0.04
query9	0.37	0.32	0.31
query10	0.56	0.57	0.54
query11	0.20	0.14	0.14
query12	0.19	0.14	0.14
query13	0.47	0.48	0.46
query14	1.02	1.00	1.00
query15	0.60	0.58	0.59
query16	0.34	0.34	0.32
query17	1.11	1.16	1.10
query18	0.23	0.21	0.22
query19	2.06	1.96	1.94
query20	0.02	0.01	0.01
query21	15.42	0.23	0.14
query22	4.74	0.05	0.05
query23	16.12	0.31	0.12
query24	2.96	0.43	0.35
query25	0.11	0.05	0.04
query26	0.74	0.22	0.17
query27	0.05	0.03	0.04
query28	3.52	0.98	0.53
query29	12.50	4.28	3.50
query30	0.29	0.16	0.16
query31	2.78	0.60	0.32
query32	3.23	0.59	0.49
query33	3.17	3.20	3.18
query34	15.52	4.21	3.52
query35	3.51	3.52	3.53
query36	0.56	0.46	0.42
query37	0.10	0.06	0.06
query38	0.06	0.04	0.04
query39	0.04	0.03	0.03
query40	0.19	0.16	0.16
query41	0.09	0.03	0.03
query42	0.04	0.02	0.02
query43	0.04	0.03	0.04
Total cold run time: 96.51 s
Total hot run time: 25.27 s

hello-stephen · 2026-06-17T07:03:51Z

FE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 100.00% (1/1) 🎉
Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

hello-stephen · 2026-06-17T07:44:21Z

FE Regression Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 4.17% (1/24) 🎉
Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

airborne12 · 2026-06-18T08:48:29Z

/review

github-actions

Review opinion: request changes.

I found one functional gap and several regression-test issues introduced by the PR updates. I did not duplicate the existing inline threads about the original default/config V1 path, assertThrows message check, broad residual V1 suite failures, or the earlier non-failing legacy fixture.

Critical checkpoint conclusions:

Goal and proof: Not fully met. Explicit CREATE TABLE rejection is covered, but ALTER TABLE ADD INDEX on an existing V1 table can still create a new V1 index, and several updated tests now fail, do nothing, or provide dead coverage.
Scope and focus: The FE change is small, but the regression edits are broader than needed and comment out unrelated assertions.
Concurrency and lifecycle: No new concurrency or lifecycle-management risk found in the touched code.
Config: A mutable master-only V1 creation escape hatch was added for tests; production blocking still depends on admins not enabling it.
Compatibility and parallel paths: Existing V1 metadata loading is preserved, but the schema-change add-index path was not updated alongside table-property analysis.
Conditional checks and error handling: The explicit V1 error is clear; no exception-boundary issue found in the changed FE code.
Tests and results: Current test coverage has regressions: ANN V1 negative coverage was changed into a V2 success path, the alter-format suite is now a no-op, a V1-only debug point is exercised only with V2, and a variant subtype negative case was disabled.
Observability, transaction/persistence, FE-BE variable passing, and performance: No additional issues found beyond the new V1-index creation path.
User focus: No additional user-provided review focus was supplied.

airborne12

Requesting changes for the V1 deprecation semantics and compatibility coverage issues called out inline.

airborne12 · 2026-08-21T06:31:25Z

run buildall

hello-stephen · 2026-08-21T08:11:06Z

TPC-H: Total hot run time: 17394 ms

machine: 'aliyun_ecs.c7a.8xlarge_32C64G'
scripts: https://github.com/apache/doris/tree/master/tools/tpch-tools
Tpch sf100 test result on commit 0d6db7ff05fec48026e7b0acecdadb1cce786a76, data reload: false
------ Round 1 ----------------------------------
============================================
q1	17606	3125	3123	3123
q2	1881	245	153	153
q3	10454	897	516	516
q4	4671	257	202	202
q5	7674	582	400	400
q6	140	115	95	95
q7	534	521	383	383
q8	9262	953	940	940
q9	3524	2423	2441	2423
q10	6505	854	717	717
q11	441	271	248	248
q12	699	387	337	337
q13	17882	1549	1192	1192
q14	159	152	139	139
q15	q16	442	403	367	367
q17	847	812	812	812
q18	3110	2267	2274	2267
q19	1134	944	734	734
q20	652	512	449	449
q21	5339	1664	1901	1664
q22	330	266	233	233
Total cold run time: 93286 ms
Total hot run time: 17394 ms
----- Round 2, with runtime_filter_mode=off -----
============================================
q1	3528	3388	3437	3388
q2	210	220	155	155
q3	2236	2307	2170	2170
q4	1208	1175	891	891
q5	2210	2131	2113	2113
q6	168	119	87	87
q7	1061	927	859	859
q8	1652	1469	1450	1450
q9	3209	3182	3186	3182
q10	1875	1789	1642	1642
q11	359	276	253	253
q12	459	429	345	345
q13	1486	1528	1165	1165
q14	170	169	165	165
q15	q16	398	404	359	359
q17	1063	1053	1049	1049
q18	5070	4475	4823	4475
q19	1991	869	856	856
q20	955	944	814	814
q21	3925	3088	3312	3088
q22	412	352	317	317
Total cold run time: 33645 ms
Total hot run time: 28823 ms

hello-stephen · 2026-08-21T08:17:40Z

TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 83734 ms

machine: 'aliyun_ecs.c7a.8xlarge_32C64G'
scripts: https://github.com/apache/doris/tree/master/tools/tpcds-tools
TPC-DS sf100 test result on commit 0d6db7ff05fec48026e7b0acecdadb1cce786a76, data reload: false
query5	4303	428	333	333
query6	412	160	153	153
query7	4877	453	273	273
query8	289	123	114	114
query9	8681	2916	2897	2897
query10	433	256	227	227
query11	5370	1057	941	941
query12	120	71	71	71
query13	1198	462	324	324
query14	6113	2252	2122	2122
query14_1	2019	2007	2004	2004
query15	180	121	109	109
query16	933	380	370	370
query17	823	470	373	373
query18	2334	339	239	239
query19	169	153	118	118
query20	73	72	73	72
query21	212	122	103	103
query22	5414	5257	5275	5257
query23	6778	6162	6096	6096
query23_1	6239	6212	6277	6212
query24	7265	1123	806	806
query24_1	750	801	810	801
query25	437	311	267	267
query26	1252	277	176	176
query27	2683	423	281	281
query28	4676	1500	1523	1500
query29	966	450	373	373
query30	284	183	154	154
query31	859	430	380	380
query32	100	50	52	50
query33	467	218	193	193
query34	979	850	459	459
query35	411	399	338	338
query36	563	545	537	537
query37	123	81	73	73
query38	1032	872	843	843
query39	487	498	480	480
query39_1	468	477	476	476
query40	222	127	121	121
query41	57	58	56	56
query42	85	80	76	76
query43	247	247	217	217
query44	1025	556	548	548
query45	114	106	99	99
query46	784	838	537	537
query47	780	751	706	706
query48	329	302	250	250
query49	541	241	195	195
query50	802	362	267	267
query51	8366	7990	8197	7990
query52	80	73	64	64
query53	207	225	160	160
query54	252	184	162	162
query55	76	58	52	52
query56	219	217	212	212
query57	716	678	664	664
query58	232	201	187	187
query59	1236	1252	1119	1119
query60	260	207	190	190
query61	140	120	137	120
query62	363	206	206	206
query63	184	165	160	160
query64	2629	732	600	600
query65	1637	1659	1631	1631
query66	2030	302	246	246
query67	10167	9557	9688	9557
query68	2897	1153	744	744
query69	325	225	187	187
query70	662	623	595	595
query71	302	274	254	254
query72	2313	1691	1527	1527
query73	640	622	344	344
query74	1833	1233	1142	1142
query75	1229	1168	1022	1022
query76	2295	740	557	557
query77	251	265	212	212
query78	3933	3621	3272	3272
query79	2780	873	622	622
query80	1592	402	337	337
query81	531	195	180	180
query82	636	151	101	101
query83	310	251	235	235
query84	309	124	106	106
query85	893	452	367	367
query86	478	166	159	159
query87	1001	988	916	916
query88	2852	2159	2103	2103
query89	313	228	205	205
query90	2032	151	148	148
query91	154	144	120	120
query92	60	46	42	42
query93	1603	1145	759	759
query94	648	260	207	207
query95	614	376	338	338
query96	785	571	278	278
query97	1065	1048	988	988
query98	168	137	137	137
query99	412	359	310	310
Total cold run time: 179869 ms
Total hot run time: 83734 ms

hello-stephen · 2026-08-21T08:22:02Z

ClickBench: Total hot run time: 14.66 s

machine: 'aliyun_ecs.c7a.8xlarge_32C64G'
scripts: https://github.com/apache/doris/tree/master/tools/clickbench-tools
ClickBench test result on commit 0d6db7ff05fec48026e7b0acecdadb1cce786a76, data reload: false
query1	0.00	0.01	0.00
query2	0.07	0.04	0.03
query3	0.24	0.10	0.10
query4	1.60	0.10	0.10
query5	0.17	0.16	0.16
query6	1.25	0.68	0.69
query7	0.03	0.00	0.00
query8	0.04	0.03	0.02
query9	0.30	0.21	0.21
query10	0.37	0.35	0.34
query11	0.17	0.11	0.12
query12	0.15	0.12	0.13
query13	0.32	0.31	0.30
query14	0.44	0.45	0.46
query15	0.36	0.34	0.36
query16	0.23	0.23	0.24
query17	0.69	0.68	0.72
query18	0.18	0.17	0.18
query19	1.20	1.11	1.18
query20	0.01	0.00	0.00
query21	15.43	0.15	0.11
query22	5.10	0.04	0.04
query23	16.30	0.25	0.10
query24	2.98	0.30	0.26
query25	0.11	0.05	0.03
query26	0.84	0.16	0.13
query27	0.03	0.04	0.03
query28	3.64	0.61	0.27
query29	12.39	3.15	2.55
query30	0.25	0.12	0.13
query31	2.75	0.36	0.18
query32	3.52	0.34	0.24
query33	1.34	1.45	1.47
query34	15.36	2.19	1.78
query35	1.73	1.72	1.72
query36	0.46	0.30	0.29
query37	0.06	0.04	0.04
query38	0.04	0.03	0.02
query39	0.03	0.03	0.02
query40	0.12	0.07	0.08
query41	0.07	0.03	0.02
query42	0.03	0.03	0.02
query43	0.03	0.03	0.02
Total cold run time: 90.43 s
Total hot run time: 14.66 s

hello-stephen · 2026-08-21T08:46:52Z

FE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 57.14% (4/7) 🎉
Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

hello-stephen · 2026-08-21T10:31:57Z

FE Regression Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 2.11% (3/142) 🎉
Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

airborne12

LGTM

…4522 When users copy historical DDL that explicitly sets inverted index format to V1, new tables are silently created with V1, which lacks small-file merging and bypasses the packed file path, amplifying object-storage PUT requests. Block new inverted index V1 creation at FE (CREATE/ALTER and runtime config set), add a deprecation regression test, and migrate ~50 regression suites off V1. Conflicts: fe/fe-common/.../Config.java - branch-4.1 keeps the bilingual description array; merged it with the new RuntimeConfigHandler callback (ConfField callback mechanism exists in 4.1's ConfigBase). Re-indented for checkstyle. fe/fe-core/.../SchemaChangeHandler.java - kept 4.1's indexDef.getColumns() (getColumnNames() is master-only drift); inserted the V1-block check as-is. regression-test/... - test_nereids_show_{build_,}index.groovy live under nereids_p0/show/ on 4.1 (moved to query_p0/show/ on master); edits landed there. - test_index_change_6.groovy: adopted the PR's nonConcurrent tag, kept 4.1's timeout=60000 (master's 300000 is unrelated drift). - dropped V1 sections exactly as the source PR did in io_context / multi_match / index_change_6 / var_index. (cherry picked from commit d1070cb)

IcebergWritePlanProviderTest asserts baseSnapshotId == null for an explicitly pinned empty read, but apache#66348 intentionally changed this to keep the pinned -1 as an OCC fence; the test from apache#66345 was not updated. PropertyAnalyzerTest expects the partition-level "only supports V2, V3 and SNII" message for V1, but apache#64522 already throws the "deprecated" message inside analyzeInvertedIndexFileStorageFormat before the partition-level check can run, making the expected branch unreachable. Update the Iceberg assertion to expect -1 (matching the intent documented in apache#66348), and accept either V1-rejection message in the PropertyAnalyzer assertion. Test-only, no production code changed.

…4522 When users copy historical DDL that explicitly sets inverted index format to V1, new tables are silently created with V1, which lacks small-file merging and bypasses the packed file path, amplifying object-storage PUT requests. Block new inverted index V1 creation at FE (CREATE/ALTER and runtime config set), add a deprecation regression test, and migrate ~50 regression suites off V1. Conflicts: fe/fe-common/.../Config.java - branch-4.1 keeps the bilingual description array; merged it with the new RuntimeConfigHandler callback (ConfField callback mechanism exists in 4.1's ConfigBase). Re-indented for checkstyle. fe/fe-core/.../SchemaChangeHandler.java - kept 4.1's indexDef.getColumns() (getColumnNames() is master-only drift); inserted the V1-block check as-is. regression-test/... - test_nereids_show_{build_,}index.groovy live under nereids_p0/show/ on 4.1 (moved to query_p0/show/ on master); edits landed there. - test_index_change_6.groovy: adopted the PR's nonConcurrent tag, kept 4.1's timeout=60000 (master's 300000 is unrelated drift). - dropped V1 sections exactly as the source PR did in io_context / multi_match / index_change_6 / var_index. (cherry picked from commit d1070cb)

…67342) ### What problem does this PR solve? Issue Number: N/A Related PR: #64522 (master), picked from commit d1070cb Problem Summary: Backport of #64522 to branch-4.1. When users copy historical DDL that explicitly sets inverted index format to V1, new tables are silently created with V1. V1 lacks small-file merging and bypasses the packed file path, significantly amplifying PUT requests to object storage. This change blocks new inverted index V1 creation at FE (CREATE TABLE / CREATE INDEX / ALTER, and runtime `ADMIN SET FRONTEND CONFIG`), adds a V1-deprecation regression test, and migrates ~50 regression suites off V1. **Hunk audit (source diff → this PR)**: 57 files total — **50 Ported (verbatim)** (byte-identical change sets, incl. the new `InvertedIndexStorageFormatValidator` and `test_inverted_index_v1_deprecated`), **7 Adapted**: | File | Adaptation | |---|---| | `Config.java` | 4.1 keeps the bilingual description array; merged with the new `RuntimeConfigHandler` callback (ConfField `callback` mechanism exists in 4.1's `ConfigBase`); re-indented for checkstyle | | `SchemaChangeHandler.java` | the +7-line V1-block check ported verbatim; kept 4.1's `indexDef.getColumns()` (`getColumnNames()` in the conflict context is master-only drift, not part of the source diff) | | `test_nereids_show_build_index.groovy` / `test_nereids_show_index.groovy` | these suites live under `nereids_p0/show/` on 4.1 (moved to `query_p0/show/` on master); the ±2 edits landed at the 4.1 paths | | `test_index_change_6.groovy` | adopted the PR's `nonConcurrent` tag; kept 4.1's `timeout = 60000` (master's 300000 is unrelated drift); V1 section (-83 lines) removed as in source | | `test_index_io_context.groovy` / `test_index_multi_match.groovy` / `var_index.groovy` | V1 tables/sections removed exactly as in source; post-resolution V1-identifier sweep matches master's files 1:1 | **Local verification on this branch (ASAN build)**: - FE UT: `ConfigTest` 6/6, `PropertyAnalyzerTest` 12/12 (both actually executed, verified in surefire output) - Regression: all 46 suites touched by this PR (23 inverted_index_p0, 7 fault_injection_p0, 6 variant_p0, 2 nereids_p0/show, 1 fault_injection_p2, plus ann_index/correctness/datatype/function/insert_overwrite/nereids_arith/variant_mv) ran against a local 1FE+1BE cluster built from this PR — **46/46 passed, 0 failed** (incl. the new `test_inverted_index_v1_deprecated`) ### Release note Inverted index V1 is deprecated: creating new tables/indexes with `inverted_index_storage_format = V1` (and setting it via `ADMIN SET FRONTEND CONFIG`) is now rejected. Existing V1 tables are unaffected. ### Check List (For Author) - Test  - [x] Regression test - [x] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason  - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [x] Yes.  New inverted index V1 creation is rejected at FE (same behavior as master after #64522). - Does this need documentation? - [x] No. - [ ] Yes.  ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label  Co-authored-by: liangj777 <106017102+LIANG751234313@users.noreply.github.com>

LIANG751234313 changed the title ~~fix: block inverted index V1 creation in FE [DORIS-26415]~~[fix](fe) block inverted index V1 creation in FE [DORIS-26415]Jun 17, 2026

airborne12 previously approved these changes Jun 17, 2026
View reviewed changes

github-actionsBot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Jun 17, 2026

github-actionsBot added the reviewed label Jun 17, 2026

github-actionsBot requested changes Jun 17, 2026
View reviewed changes

LIANG751234313 dismissed airborne12’s stale review via d75b137June 18, 2026 02:20

LIANG751234313 force-pushed the fix/DORIS-26415-block-inverted-index-v1 branch from c5625f0 to 926aac4Compare June 18, 2026 07:52

github-actionsBot requested changes Jun 18, 2026
View reviewed changes

LIANG751234313 force-pushed the fix/DORIS-26415-block-inverted-index-v1 branch from 1717801 to c9a2c04Compare June 18, 2026 10:56

LIANG751234313 requested review from gavinchou and luwei16 as code owners June 18, 2026 10:56

LIANG751234313 force-pushed the fix/DORIS-26415-block-inverted-index-v1 branch from 9c94978 to 052ed42Compare June 23, 2026 04:11

airborne12 reviewed Jun 24, 2026
View reviewed changes

Comment threadthirdparty/build-thirdparty.sh Outdated

github-actionsBot removed the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Jun 24, 2026

airborne12 requested changes Jun 24, 2026
View reviewed changes

LIANG751234313 force-pushed the fix/DORIS-26415-block-inverted-index-v1 branch from cc4ae77 to cec3caaCompare June 26, 2026 06:01

airborne12 reviewed Jun 26, 2026
View reviewed changes

Comment threadfe/fe-common/src/main/java/org/apache/doris/common/Config.java Outdated

airborne12 reviewed Jun 26, 2026
View reviewed changes

Comment threadfe/fe-core/src/main/java/org/apache/doris/alter/SchemaChangeHandler.java Outdated

LIANG751234313 force-pushed the fix/DORIS-26415-block-inverted-index-v1 branch from 008aee3 to 0ce59aaCompare June 29, 2026 08:53

LIANG751234313 dismissed airborne12’s stale review via 0d6db7fAugust 21, 2026 06:26

LIANG751234313 force-pushed the fix/DORIS-26415-block-inverted-index-v1 branch from 3142fdb to 0d6db7fCompare August 21, 2026 06:26

morningman approved these changes Aug 21, 2026
View reviewed changes

LIANG751234313 requested review from airborne12 and gavinchou August 21, 2026 06:31

airborne12 approved these changes Aug 24, 2026
View reviewed changes

gavinchou approved these changes Aug 24, 2026
View reviewed changes

airborne12 merged commit d1070cb into apache:masterAug 24, 2026
32 of 33 checks passed

airborne12 added dev/3.1.x dev/4.0.x dev/4.1.x labels Aug 24, 2026

github-actionsBot added the dev/4.1.x-conflict label Aug 24, 2026

airborne12 mentioned this pull request Aug 31, 2026
branch-4.1: [fix](fe) block inverted index V1 creation in FE #64522 #67342
Merged
16 tasks

This was referenced Sep 1, 2026
[Bug] Two FE UT failures on current master #67403
Open
[fix](fe) Redirect forward-to-master statements to the real master after failover #67310
Open
[fix](test) Align two UT assertions with current master behavior #67404
Open

yiguolei added dev/4.1.5-merged and removed dev/4.1.x dev/4.1.x-conflict labels Sep 5, 2026

Uh oh!

Conversation

LIANG751234313 commented Jun 15, 2026• edited by eldenmoon Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

What problem does this PR solve?

Release note

Check List (For Author)

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

Uh oh!

hello-stephen commented Jun 15, 2026

Uh oh!

airborne12 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

airborne12 commented Jun 17, 2026

Uh oh!

airborne12 commented Jun 17, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actionsBot commented Jun 17, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actionsBot commented Jun 17, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actionsBot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

hello-stephen commented Jun 17, 2026

Uh oh!

hello-stephen commented Jun 17, 2026

Uh oh!

hello-stephen commented Jun 17, 2026

Uh oh!

hello-stephen commented Jun 17, 2026

FE UT Coverage Report

Uh oh!

hello-stephen commented Jun 17, 2026

FE Regression Coverage Report

Uh oh!

airborne12 commented Jun 18, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actionsBot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

airborne12 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

airborne12 commented Aug 21, 2026

Uh oh!

hello-stephen commented Aug 21, 2026

Uh oh!

hello-stephen commented Aug 21, 2026

Uh oh!

hello-stephen commented Aug 21, 2026

Uh oh!

hello-stephen commented Aug 21, 2026

FE UT Coverage Report

Uh oh!

hello-stephen commented Aug 21, 2026

FE Regression Coverage Report

Uh oh!

airborne12 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

LIANG751234313 commented Jun 15, 2026•
edited by eldenmoon
Loading