Skip to content

[feature-wip] Support datev2 - #9758

Closed
Gabriel39 wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:masterfrom
Gabriel39:support_datev2
Closed

[feature-wip] Support datev2#9758
Gabriel39 wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:masterfrom
Gabriel39:support_datev2

Conversation

@Gabriel39

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Proposed changes

Issue Number: #9575

Problem Summary:

Describe the overview of changes.

Checklist(Required)

  1. Does it affect the original behavior: (Yes/No/I Don't know)
  2. Has unit tests been added: (Yes/No/No Need)
  3. Has document been added or modified: (Yes/No/No Need)
  4. Does it need to update dependencies: (Yes/No)
  5. Are there any changes that cannot be rolled back: (Yes/No)

Further comments

If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at dev@doris.apache.org by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...

@Gabriel39

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

This job is still WIP. This PR support DateV2 for BE. DateTimeV2 depends on DecimalV3 (WIP) so is not included now. Besides, this PR only refactored execution layer and I will refactor unified date type on execution layer and storage layer in future

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added area/sql/function Issues or PRs related to the SQL functions area/vectorization labels May 24, 2022
@Gabriel39
Gabriel39force-pushed the support_datev2 branch 4 times, most recently from af89bdb to 5cf1074CompareMay 26, 2022 11:03
@morningmanmorningman added this to the v1.2 milestone May 27, 2022
@Gabriel39

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

To avoid rebase problem, I take all changes in FE and BE into a single PR 9916. And I just closed this PR.

@Gabriel39
Gabriel39 deleted the support_datev2 branch July 30, 2026 06:28
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/sql/functionIssues or PRs related to the SQL functionsarea/vectorization

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Gabriel39@morningman