Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
HBASE-26782 Minor code cleanup in and around RpcExecutor - #4144
Conversation
ndimiduk
commented
Mar 1, 2022
Since |
ndimiduk
commented
Mar 1, 2022
I don't think these files have been touched recently, so pining a wide reviewer audience. Sorry for the spam. |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
ndimiduk
commented
Mar 3, 2022
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
stoty
commented
Mar 3, 2022
Thanks for the heads-up @ndimiduk . Yes, Phoenix does use custom RpcSchedulers, and would be affected by the change. While we can probably shim over the differences, it would be easier for us if the signature wouldn't change. We'd prefer that this wouldn't change in branch-2.4, or even better on branch-2. |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
ndimiduk
commented
Mar 4, 2022
Okay, let me separate the |
6b1b4f2 to
c3821cdCompareApache-HBase
commented
Mar 4, 2022
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
Signed-off-by: Bharath Vissapragada <bharathv@apache.org> Signed-off-by: Duo Zhang <zhangduo@apache.org>
c3821cd to
629fbacCompareApache-HBase
commented
Mar 7, 2022
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
Apache-HBase
commented
Mar 7, 2022
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
Apache-HBase
commented
Mar 7, 2022
🎊 +1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
While working on tracing, I see some minor cleanup that can be done in the RpcScheduler and
RpcExecutor classes. The implementations of the
dispatchmethods don't actually throw theexceptions defined in their signatures, and there's some simplification to be done and checkstyle
warnings to resolve while I'm in there.