Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is it okay to drop the table context of the rowkeys in the returned value? a rowkey is only meaningful in the context of its table (or region).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We talked about this a bit offline. We can purge these rowkeys because they are only returned by
handleBulkloadif we have bulk loaded the keys in this backup.Right now an inopportune failure would result in us missing bulk load data on subsequent incremental backups, but with this change an inopportune failure would result is us backing up duplicative files which should be just a little bit wasteful, but otherwise innocuous
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it worth having some backup consistency check that can detect and purge extra files? Or do we think that backups will cycle out and the redundancy will be dropped the next time a full backup is taken?