feat: Add support for writing bloom filters

[renaudb]

Closes#850

Note: This PR is currently held back by boto requiring pyarrow<=23.1 as bloom filter write support was added in pyarrow 24.

Rationale for this change

Add support for writing bloom filters to parquet files. This changes leverages the new bloom_filter_optionswrite_parquet argument in pyarrow 24.

Are these changes tested?

Added tests for the metadata parsing. Added a very basic test for the writing path (there is currently no way to test for the existence of a bloomfilter in a parquet file using pyarrow).

Are there any user-facing changes?

N/A

[Fokko]

Thanks for working on this @renaudb. I've noticed that in the uv.lock we're behind some versions of boto3/botocore, not sure why this. Maybe we can bump this with uv sync --upgrade manually (in a separate PR).

[renaudb]

@Fokko the issue is with Bodo, not Boto. Bodo forces pyarrow>=23.0,<23.1. I saw a bunch of issues filed on their hand about how this is too restrictive, but it looks like they are limited in changing it.

https://github.com/bodo-ai/Bodo/blob/main/pyproject.toml#L9

[renaudb]

@Fokko this should be ready for review.

[github-actions]

This pull request has been marked as stale due to 30 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 1 week if no further activity occurs. If you think that's incorrect or this pull request requires a review, please simply write any comment. If closed, you can revive the PR at any time and @mention a reviewer or discuss it on the dev@iceberg.apache.org list. Thank you for your contributions.

[github-actions]

This pull request has been closed due to lack of activity. This is not a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It is just a way of keeping the PR queue manageable. If you think that is incorrect, or the pull request requires review, you can revive the PR at any time.

[renaudb]

Pyarrow 25 was released so the test for bloomfilter existence should now pass.

[renaudb]

@abnobdoss do you have the ability to reopen the PR? I don't see to have the permission to do it.

[abnobdoss]

Hi @renaudb, I don't believe I can either.

@kevinjqliu / @Fokko / @geruh would you be able to re-open this?

[raphaelauv]

@renaudb otherwise you could open a new PR ( using the same branch ). Thanks again for all this works

[renaudb]

Reopened here: #3757