Pipe Plugin: Only Allow Create Model Compatible Plugins

[SteveYurongSu]

No description provided.

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR introduces a model compatibility check for Pipe Plugin creation by adding a new boolean field to track whether a plugin is designed for table model usage. Key changes include:

• Adding an "isTableModel" field and associated accessor methods in CreatePipePluginStatement.
• Setting the "isTableModel" flag appropriately in two constructor overloads in CreatePipePluginTask.
• Enhancing the plugin class loading process in ClusterConfigTaskExecutor by checking model compatibility and adjusting error messages accordingly.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File	Description
iotdb-core/datanode/src/main/java/org/apache/iotdb/db/queryengine/plan/statement/metadata/pipe/CreatePipePluginStatement.java	Introduces and manages the isTableModel flag
iotdb-core/datanode/src/main/java/org/apache/iotdb/db/queryengine/plan/execution/config/metadata/CreatePipePluginTask.java	Sets isTableModel flag based on the constructor used
iotdb-core/datanode/src/main/java/org/apache/iotdb/db/queryengine/plan/execution/config/executor/ClusterConfigTaskExecutor.java	Uses isTableModel with VisibilityUtils to verify plugin compatibility and update error reporting

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

iotdb-core/datanode/src/main/java/org/apache/iotdb/db/queryengine/plan/execution/config/executor/ClusterConfigTaskExecutor.java:979

• [nitpick] The use of the isTableModel boolean to determine whether to display 'table' or 'tree' in the error message may lead to ambiguity in understanding the plugin type. Consider renaming the flag to something more descriptive (e.g., 'designedForTableModel') or clarifying the message to explicitly state 'table model' vs 'non-table model'.

LOGGER.warn(
"Failed to create PipePlugin({}) because this plugin is not designed for {} model.",
createPipePluginStatement.getPluginName(),
isTableModel ? "table" : "tree");

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 17 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 39.32%. Comparing base (3d1cd0e) to head (d393dfd).
Report is 7 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ion/config/executor/ClusterConfigTaskExecutor.java	0.00%	11 Missing ⚠️
...ement/metadata/pipe/CreatePipePluginStatement.java	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
...xecution/config/metadata/CreatePipePluginTask.java	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #15227 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 39.36% 39.32% -0.04% 
Complexity 193 193 ============================================
Files 4623 4624 +1 Lines 297495 297576 +81 Branches 37133 37135 +2 ============================================
- Hits 117097 117024 -73 - Misses 180398 180552 +154 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.