Skip to content

Add some supplementary logs during partition allocation - #15234

Merged
OneSizeFitsQuorum merged 4 commits into
masterfrom
more-logs-4-partition-allocation
Mar 31, 2025
Merged

Add some supplementary logs during partition allocation#15234
OneSizeFitsQuorum merged 4 commits into
masterfrom
more-logs-4-partition-allocation

Conversation

@CRZbulabula

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The process of creating partitions might throw some NPEs when the corresponding database is deleted logically. Thus, we add some logs for clearing the bug suspicion.

CopilotAI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds supplementary logging and database existence checks to help diagnose partition allocation issues, particularly when the corresponding database is logically deleted.

  • Updated logging in DeleteDatabaseProcedure to include the database name.
  • Added database existence checks with error messages in getOrCreateSchemaPartition and getOrCreateDataPartition methods.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

FileDescription
DeleteDatabaseProcedure.javaUpdated log message to be more descriptive with the database name.
PartitionManager.javaIntroduced database existence checks and refined error messages for both schema and data partition allocations.

CRZbulabulaand others added 2 commits March 31, 2025 15:27
…e/manager/partition/PartitionManager.java
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
…e/manager/partition/PartitionManager.java
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@codecov

codecovBot commented Mar 31, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 33 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 39.41%. Comparing base (bcb18d2) to head (ea6658d).
Report is 89 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
...confignode/manager/partition/PartitionManager.java0.00%31 Missing ⚠️
...procedure/impl/schema/DeleteDatabaseProcedure.java0.00%2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #15234 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 39.35% 39.41% +0.06% 
Complexity 193 193 ============================================
Files 4596 4624 +28 Lines 295656 297771 +2115 Branches 36847 37171 +324 ============================================
+ Hits 116343 117362 +1019 - Misses 179313 180409 +1096 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@OneSizeFitsQuorumOneSizeFitsQuorum left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@OneSizeFitsQuorum
OneSizeFitsQuorum merged commit b6fea63 into masterMar 31, 2025
@OneSizeFitsQuorum
OneSizeFitsQuorum deleted the more-logs-4-partition-allocation branch March 31, 2025 12:15
JackieTien97 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2025
* finished
* add database not exists exception
* Update iotdb-core/confignode/src/main/java/org/apache/iotdb/confignode/manager/partition/PartitionManager.java
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update iotdb-core/confignode/src/main/java/org/apache/iotdb/confignode/manager/partition/PartitionManager.java
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit b6fea63)
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@CRZbulabula@OneSizeFitsQuorum