Skip to content

docs(spec-loop): align reviewer-routing coverage claim #1113

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
potiuk merged 1 commit into from
Aug 25, 2026
Merged

docs(spec-loop): align reviewer-routing coverage claim #1113

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion tools/spec-loop/specs/reviewer-routing.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -120,7 +120,8 @@ uv run --project tools/skill-evals skill-eval tools/skill-evals/evals/reviewer-r
- **Non-ASF roster shape is now exercised.** `projects/non-asf-example/reviewer-roster.md`
provides a Velox Stream roster with no ASF-specific fields; the
`non-asf-profile-smoke/step-reviewer-routing/` eval suite asserts that
area-match routing and load-aware fallback both work under the
area-match routing selects a primary reviewer and that a no-area-match case
returns `NO ELIGIBLE REVIEWER` without proposing a fallback under the
`organization: independent` profile. Gap cleared.
- **`experimental` — no adopter pilot has run.** The skill ships but no
end-to-end routing workflow has been exercised in a live maintainer
Expand Down