Skip to content

streaming-remount background-restore test is flaky on macOS #3061

Closed
#3101
Closed
streaming-remount background-restore test is flaky on macOS#3061
#3101
Labels
bugSomething isn't workinghelp wantedExtra attention is needed

Description

@Astro-Han
Astro-Han
opened on Aug 15, 2026

Problem

apps/desktop/e2e/streaming-remount.spec.ts:67 ("returning to a live conversation settles output accumulated while away") fails roughly one run in six on macOS, and only when the whole file runs — the test passes consistently on its own.

The failing assertion is that no intermediate paint shows partially accumulated background output:

expect(backgroundRestoreObserved?.texts.some((text) =>
text.includes('background output') && !text.includes(backgroundSteering)
)).toBe(false);

The observer watches document.body with subtree: true and samples .maka-bubble-streaming's textContent on every mutation, so its sampling rate depends on how much unrelated DOM churns during the restore. That makes it sensitive to changes elsewhere in the shell, which is a fragile way to assert "no intermediate paint".

Measured before and after #3033's row rebuild: about 1 failure in 7 and 1 in 6 respectively, so the rate is not obviously changed by that work. CI (Linux) has not reproduced it.

Either the intermediate paint is real and rare — in which case the test is finding a genuine bug and should be made deterministic enough to prove it — or the observation method is too coarse. Worth resolving before it gets muted.

Context

Observed while verifying #3033.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    bugSomething isn't workinghelp wantedExtra attention is needed

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all 
       blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
streaming-remount background-restore test is flaky on macOS · Issue #3061 · apache/maka · GitHub
      Skip to content
      streaming-remount background-restore test is flaky on macOS #3061
      Closed
      #3101
      Closed
      streaming-remount background-restore test is flaky on macOS#3061
      #3101
      Labels
      bugSomething isn't workinghelp wantedExtra attention is needed
      Description
      @Astro-Han
      Astro-Han
      opened on Aug 15, 2026
      Problem
      apps/desktop/e2e/streaming-remount.spec.ts:67 ("returning to a live conversation settles output accumulated while away") fails roughly one run in six on macOS, and only when the whole file runs — the test passes consistently on its own.
      The failing assertion is that no intermediate paint shows partially accumulated background output:
      expect(backgroundRestoreObserved?.texts.some((text) =>
text.includes('background output') && !text.includes(backgroundSteering)
)).toBe(false);

      The observer watches document.body with subtree: true and samples .maka-bubble-streaming's textContent on every mutation, so its sampling rate depends on how much unrelated DOM churns during the restore. That makes it sensitive to changes elsewhere in the shell, which is a fragile way to assert "no intermediate paint".
      Measured before and after #3033's row rebuild: about 1 failure in 7 and 1 in 6 respectively, so the rate is not obviously changed by that work. CI (Linux) has not reproduced it.
      Either the intermediate paint is real and rare — in which case the test is finding a genuine bug and should be made deterministic enough to prove it — or the observation method is too coarse. Worth resolving before it gets muted.
      Context
      Observed while verifying #3033.
      Metadata
      Metadata
      Assignees
      No one assigned
        Labels
        bugSomething isn't workinghelp wantedExtra attention is needed
        Type
        No type
        Projects
        No projects
          Milestone
          No milestone
          Relationships
          None yet
          Development
          No branches or pull requests
          Issue actions
          
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode
(function() {
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '
.markdown-body {
color-scheme: dark light;
}
.markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }
.markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }
.markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }
.markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }
.markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }
.markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }
';
document.head.appendChild(style);
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
streaming-remount background-restore test is flaky on macOS · Issue #3061 · apache/maka · GitHub
          Skip to content
          streaming-remount background-restore test is flaky on macOS #3061
          Closed
          #3101
          Closed
          streaming-remount background-restore test is flaky on macOS#3061
          #3101
          Labels
          bugSomething isn't workinghelp wantedExtra attention is needed
          Description
          @Astro-Han
          Astro-Han
          opened on Aug 15, 2026
          Problem
          apps/desktop/e2e/streaming-remount.spec.ts:67 ("returning to a live conversation settles output accumulated while away") fails roughly one run in six on macOS, and only when the whole file runs — the test passes consistently on its own.
          The failing assertion is that no intermediate paint shows partially accumulated background output:
          expect(backgroundRestoreObserved?.texts.some((text) =>
text.includes('background output') && !text.includes(backgroundSteering)
)).toBe(false);

          The observer watches document.body with subtree: true and samples .maka-bubble-streaming's textContent on every mutation, so its sampling rate depends on how much unrelated DOM churns during the restore. That makes it sensitive to changes elsewhere in the shell, which is a fragile way to assert "no intermediate paint".
          Measured before and after #3033's row rebuild: about 1 failure in 7 and 1 in 6 respectively, so the rate is not obviously changed by that work. CI (Linux) has not reproduced it.
          Either the intermediate paint is real and rare — in which case the test is finding a genuine bug and should be made deterministic enough to prove it — or the observation method is too coarse. Worth resolving before it gets muted.
          Context
          Observed while verifying #3033.
          Metadata
          Metadata
          Assignees
          No one assigned
            Labels
            bugSomething isn't workinghelp wantedExtra attention is needed
            Type
            No type
            Projects
            No projects
              Milestone
              No milestone
              Relationships
              None yet
              Development
              No branches or pull requests
              Issue actions
              
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer
(function() {
var ref = document.referrer;
var terms = [];
if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {
var url = new URL(ref);
var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');
if (q) {
terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });
}
}
if (terms.length === 0) return;
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';
document.head.appendChild(style);
function highlight(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node
var text = node.textContent;
var found = false;
terms.forEach(function(term) {
var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi');
if (regex.test(text)) {
found = true;
var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();
var parts = text.split(regex);
parts.forEach(function(part, i) {
if (i % 2 === 0) {
frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));
} else {
var span = document.createElement('span');
span.className = 'userscript-highlight';
span.textContent = part;
frag.appendChild(span);
}
});
node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);
}
});
} else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element
var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];
if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {
Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);
}
}
}
highlight(document.body);
// Re-highlight on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
streaming-remount background-restore test is flaky on macOS · Issue #3061 · apache/maka · GitHub
              Skip to content
              streaming-remount background-restore test is flaky on macOS #3061
              Closed
              #3101
              Closed
              streaming-remount background-restore test is flaky on macOS#3061
              #3101
              Labels
              bugSomething isn't workinghelp wantedExtra attention is needed
              Description
              @Astro-Han
              Astro-Han
              opened on Aug 15, 2026
              Problem
              apps/desktop/e2e/streaming-remount.spec.ts:67 ("returning to a live conversation settles output accumulated while away") fails roughly one run in six on macOS, and only when the whole file runs — the test passes consistently on its own.
              The failing assertion is that no intermediate paint shows partially accumulated background output:
              expect(backgroundRestoreObserved?.texts.some((text) =>
text.includes('background output') && !text.includes(backgroundSteering)
)).toBe(false);

              The observer watches document.body with subtree: true and samples .maka-bubble-streaming's textContent on every mutation, so its sampling rate depends on how much unrelated DOM churns during the restore. That makes it sensitive to changes elsewhere in the shell, which is a fragile way to assert "no intermediate paint".
              Measured before and after #3033's row rebuild: about 1 failure in 7 and 1 in 6 respectively, so the rate is not obviously changed by that work. CI (Linux) has not reproduced it.
              Either the intermediate paint is real and rare — in which case the test is finding a genuine bug and should be made deterministic enough to prove it — or the observation method is too coarse. Worth resolving before it gets muted.
              Context
              Observed while verifying #3033.
              Metadata
              Metadata
              Assignees
              No one assigned
                Labels
                bugSomething isn't workinghelp wantedExtra attention is needed
                Type
                No type
                Projects
                No projects
                  Milestone
                  No milestone
                  Relationships
                  None yet
                  Development
                  No branches or pull requests
                  Issue actions
                  
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page
(function() {
var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',
'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',
'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];
function cleanUrl(url) {
try {
var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);
var changed = false;
trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {
if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {
u.searchParams.delete(p);
changed = true;
}
});
return changed ? u.toString() : url;
} catch (e) {
return url;
}
}
function cleanLinks() {
document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
cleanLinks();
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1) {
if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();
node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
streaming-remount background-restore test is flaky on macOS · Issue #3061 · apache/maka · GitHub
                  Skip to content
                  streaming-remount background-restore test is flaky on macOS #3061
                  Closed
                  #3101
                  Closed
                  streaming-remount background-restore test is flaky on macOS#3061
                  #3101
                  Labels
                  bugSomething isn't workinghelp wantedExtra attention is needed
                  Description
                  @Astro-Han
                  Astro-Han
                  opened on Aug 15, 2026
                  Problem
                  apps/desktop/e2e/streaming-remount.spec.ts:67 ("returning to a live conversation settles output accumulated while away") fails roughly one run in six on macOS, and only when the whole file runs — the test passes consistently on its own.
                  The failing assertion is that no intermediate paint shows partially accumulated background output:
                  expect(backgroundRestoreObserved?.texts.some((text) =>
text.includes('background output') && !text.includes(backgroundSteering)
)).toBe(false);

                  The observer watches document.body with subtree: true and samples .maka-bubble-streaming's textContent on every mutation, so its sampling rate depends on how much unrelated DOM churns during the restore. That makes it sensitive to changes elsewhere in the shell, which is a fragile way to assert "no intermediate paint".
                  Measured before and after #3033's row rebuild: about 1 failure in 7 and 1 in 6 respectively, so the rate is not obviously changed by that work. CI (Linux) has not reproduced it.
                  Either the intermediate paint is real and rare — in which case the test is finding a genuine bug and should be made deterministic enough to prove it — or the observation method is too coarse. Worth resolving before it gets muted.
                  Context
                  Observed while verifying #3033.
                  Metadata
                  Metadata
                  Assignees
                  No one assigned
                    Labels
                    bugSomething isn't workinghelp wantedExtra attention is needed
                    Type
                    No type
                    Projects
                    No projects
                      Milestone
                      No milestone
                      Relationships
                      None yet
                      Development
                      No branches or pull requests
                      Issue actions
                      
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube
(function() {
function tryTheater() {
var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]');
if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {
btn.click();
}
}
// Try immediately
tryTheater();
// Try after navigation (SPA)
var lastUrl = location.href;
setInterval(function() {
if (location.href !== lastUrl) {
lastUrl = location.href;
setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);
}
}, 1000);
// Also try on player load
var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
streaming-remount background-restore test is flaky on macOS · Issue #3061 · apache/maka · GitHub
                      Skip to content
                      streaming-remount background-restore test is flaky on macOS #3061
                      Closed
                      #3101
                      Closed
                      streaming-remount background-restore test is flaky on macOS#3061
                      #3101
                      Labels
                      bugSomething isn't workinghelp wantedExtra attention is needed
                      Description
                      @Astro-Han
                      Astro-Han
                      opened on Aug 15, 2026
                      Problem
                      apps/desktop/e2e/streaming-remount.spec.ts:67 ("returning to a live conversation settles output accumulated while away") fails roughly one run in six on macOS, and only when the whole file runs — the test passes consistently on its own.
                      The failing assertion is that no intermediate paint shows partially accumulated background output:
                      expect(backgroundRestoreObserved?.texts.some((text) =>
text.includes('background output') && !text.includes(backgroundSteering)
)).toBe(false);

                      The observer watches document.body with subtree: true and samples .maka-bubble-streaming's textContent on every mutation, so its sampling rate depends on how much unrelated DOM churns during the restore. That makes it sensitive to changes elsewhere in the shell, which is a fragile way to assert "no intermediate paint".
                      Measured before and after #3033's row rebuild: about 1 failure in 7 and 1 in 6 respectively, so the rate is not obviously changed by that work. CI (Linux) has not reproduced it.
                      Either the intermediate paint is real and rare — in which case the test is finding a genuine bug and should be made deterministic enough to prove it — or the observation method is too coarse. Worth resolving before it gets muted.
                      Context
                      Observed while verifying #3033.
                      Metadata
                      Metadata
                      Assignees
                      No one assigned
                        Labels
                        bugSomething isn't workinghelp wantedExtra attention is needed
                        Type
                        No type
                        Projects
                        No projects
                          Milestone
                          No milestone
                          Relationships
                          None yet
                          Development
                          No branches or pull requests
                          Issue actions
                          
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content
(function() {
function unstick() {
document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) {
if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {
el.style.position = 'static';
el.style.top = 'auto';
el.style.zIndex = 'auto';
}
});
}
unstick();
var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
streaming-remount background-restore test is flaky on macOS · Issue #3061 · apache/maka · GitHub
                          Skip to content
                          streaming-remount background-restore test is flaky on macOS #3061
                          Closed
                          #3101
                          Closed
                          streaming-remount background-restore test is flaky on macOS#3061
                          #3101
                          Labels
                          bugSomething isn't workinghelp wantedExtra attention is needed
                          Description
                          @Astro-Han
                          Astro-Han
                          opened on Aug 15, 2026
                          Problem
                          apps/desktop/e2e/streaming-remount.spec.ts:67 ("returning to a live conversation settles output accumulated while away") fails roughly one run in six on macOS, and only when the whole file runs — the test passes consistently on its own.
                          The failing assertion is that no intermediate paint shows partially accumulated background output:
                          expect(backgroundRestoreObserved?.texts.some((text) =>
text.includes('background output') && !text.includes(backgroundSteering)
)).toBe(false);

                          The observer watches document.body with subtree: true and samples .maka-bubble-streaming's textContent on every mutation, so its sampling rate depends on how much unrelated DOM churns during the restore. That makes it sensitive to changes elsewhere in the shell, which is a fragile way to assert "no intermediate paint".
                          Measured before and after #3033's row rebuild: about 1 failure in 7 and 1 in 6 respectively, so the rate is not obviously changed by that work. CI (Linux) has not reproduced it.
                          Either the intermediate paint is real and rare — in which case the test is finding a genuine bug and should be made deterministic enough to prove it — or the observation method is too coarse. Worth resolving before it gets muted.
                          Context
                          Observed while verifying #3033.
                          Metadata
                          Metadata
                          Assignees
                          No one assigned
                            Labels
                            bugSomething isn't workinghelp wantedExtra attention is needed
                            Type
                            No type
                            Projects
                            No projects
                              Milestone
                              No milestone
                              Relationships
                              None yet
                              Development
                              No branches or pull requests
                              Issue actions
                              
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site
(function() {
var enabled = true;
function applyDarkMode() {
if (!enabled) return;
// Create style element if it doesn't exist
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (!style) {
style = document.createElement('style');
style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';
document.head.appendChild(style);
}
// Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video
style.textContent = '
/* Invert everything except media */
html {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #1a1a2e !important;
}
/* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */
img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
}
/* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */
.no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,
[data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"],
.ace_editor, .ace_editor *,
.CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,
.monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,
.markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,
.highlight, .highlight *,
pre code, pre code * {
filter: none !important;
}
/* Fix common UI elements */
.modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #2d2d44 !important;
border-color: #444 !important;
}
/* Scrollbars */
::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }
/* Selection */
::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
';
}
function removeDarkMode() {
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (style) style.remove();
}
// Toggle with Alt+Shift+D
document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {
if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {
e.preventDefault();
enabled = !enabled;
if (enabled) {
applyDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');
} else {
removeDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');
}
}
});
// Apply on load
applyDarkMode();
// Re-apply on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {
applyDarkMode();
}
});
observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();
streaming-remount background-restore test is flaky on macOS · Issue #3061 · apache/maka · GitHub
                              Skip to content
                              streaming-remount background-restore test is flaky on macOS #3061
                              Closed
                              #3101
                              Closed
                              streaming-remount background-restore test is flaky on macOS#3061
                              #3101
                              Labels
                              bugSomething isn't workinghelp wantedExtra attention is needed
                              Description
                              @Astro-Han
                              Astro-Han
                              opened on Aug 15, 2026
                              Problem
                              apps/desktop/e2e/streaming-remount.spec.ts:67 ("returning to a live conversation settles output accumulated while away") fails roughly one run in six on macOS, and only when the whole file runs — the test passes consistently on its own.
                              The failing assertion is that no intermediate paint shows partially accumulated background output:
                              expect(backgroundRestoreObserved?.texts.some((text) =>
text.includes('background output') && !text.includes(backgroundSteering)
)).toBe(false);

                              The observer watches document.body with subtree: true and samples .maka-bubble-streaming's textContent on every mutation, so its sampling rate depends on how much unrelated DOM churns during the restore. That makes it sensitive to changes elsewhere in the shell, which is a fragile way to assert "no intermediate paint".
                              Measured before and after #3033's row rebuild: about 1 failure in 7 and 1 in 6 respectively, so the rate is not obviously changed by that work. CI (Linux) has not reproduced it.
                              Either the intermediate paint is real and rare — in which case the test is finding a genuine bug and should be made deterministic enough to prove it — or the observation method is too coarse. Worth resolving before it gets muted.
                              Context
                              Observed while verifying #3033.
                              Metadata
                              Metadata
                              Assignees
                              No one assigned
                                Labels
                                bugSomething isn't workinghelp wantedExtra attention is needed
                                Type
                                No type
                                Projects
                                No projects
                                  Milestone
                                  No milestone
                                  Relationships
                                  None yet
                                  Development
                                  No branches or pull requests
                                  Issue actions