maven project compile args not passed to editor javac - #1173

Merged
rtaneja1 merged 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
rtaneja1:rtaneja/maven-compilerargs-issue
Mar 25, 2019
Merged

maven project compile args not passed to editor javac#1173
rtaneja1 merged 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
rtaneja1:rtaneja/maven-compilerargs-issue

Conversation

@rtaneja1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@matthiasblaesingmatthiasblaesing left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I left comments inline. There is one side question remaining: will the the compiler still work, if it is faced with unsupported parameters?

if (ARG_PARAMETERS.equals(compilerArg.trim())) {
return Arrays.asList(ARG_PARAMETERS);//reqd?
}
return Arrays.asList(compilerArgs);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see the point of this loop. Currently the code results in returning the full list of arguments, if at least one parameter is not null. I tried to provoke a NULL value in the arguments list. None of these variants resulted in a null value:

<arg></arg>
<arg/>
<argxsi:nil="true"xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"/>

So I would propose to return the argument list, if it is not null directly.

return Arrays.asList(ARG_PARAMETERS);
if (compilerArg != null) {
if (ARG_PARAMETERS.equals(compilerArg.trim())) {
return Arrays.asList(ARG_PARAMETERS);//reqd?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the original code there are only two cases:

  • if a compiler argument -parameters was provided, it will be returned
  • else an empty list is returned

This makes sense reading the commit message of the addition:
http://hg.netbeans.org/main-golden/log/tip/maven/src/org/netbeans/modules/maven/queries/PomCompilerOptionsQueryImpl.java
It is basicly a guard to limit the change to that single parameter.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, removed special handling for -parameters here.

@rtaneja1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@matthiasblaesingmatthiasblaesing left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me - thanks for the pointer to the validation code!

PS: Please squash the commits before merge.

@rtaneja1
rtaneja1 merged commit 6152dae into apache:masterMar 25, 2019
@geertjanwgeertjanw added the Cherry Pick Consider cherry picking for release update label Mar 30, 2019
@lkishalmilkishalmi removed the Cherry Pick Consider cherry picking for release update label Jun 29, 2020
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@rtaneja1@matthiasblaesing@lkishalmi@geertjanw
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

maven project compile args not passed to editor javac - #1173

Merged
rtaneja1 merged 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
rtaneja1:rtaneja/maven-compilerargs-issue
Mar 25, 2019
Merged

maven project compile args not passed to editor javac#1173
rtaneja1 merged 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
rtaneja1:rtaneja/maven-compilerargs-issue

Conversation

@rtaneja1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@matthiasblaesingmatthiasblaesing left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I left comments inline. There is one side question remaining: will the the compiler still work, if it is faced with unsupported parameters?

if (ARG_PARAMETERS.equals(compilerArg.trim())) {
return Arrays.asList(ARG_PARAMETERS);//reqd?
}
return Arrays.asList(compilerArgs);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see the point of this loop. Currently the code results in returning the full list of arguments, if at least one parameter is not null. I tried to provoke a NULL value in the arguments list. None of these variants resulted in a null value:

<arg></arg>
<arg/>
<argxsi:nil="true"xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"/>

So I would propose to return the argument list, if it is not null directly.

return Arrays.asList(ARG_PARAMETERS);
if (compilerArg != null) {
if (ARG_PARAMETERS.equals(compilerArg.trim())) {
return Arrays.asList(ARG_PARAMETERS);//reqd?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the original code there are only two cases:

  • if a compiler argument -parameters was provided, it will be returned
  • else an empty list is returned

This makes sense reading the commit message of the addition:
http://hg.netbeans.org/main-golden/log/tip/maven/src/org/netbeans/modules/maven/queries/PomCompilerOptionsQueryImpl.java
It is basicly a guard to limit the change to that single parameter.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, removed special handling for -parameters here.

@rtaneja1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@matthiasblaesingmatthiasblaesing left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me - thanks for the pointer to the validation code!

PS: Please squash the commits before merge.

@rtaneja1
rtaneja1 merged commit 6152dae into apache:masterMar 25, 2019
@geertjanwgeertjanw added the Cherry Pick Consider cherry picking for release update label Mar 30, 2019
@lkishalmilkishalmi removed the Cherry Pick Consider cherry picking for release update label Jun 29, 2020
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@rtaneja1@matthiasblaesing@lkishalmi@geertjanw
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

maven project compile args not passed to editor javac - #1173

Merged
rtaneja1 merged 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
rtaneja1:rtaneja/maven-compilerargs-issue
Mar 25, 2019
Merged

maven project compile args not passed to editor javac#1173
rtaneja1 merged 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
rtaneja1:rtaneja/maven-compilerargs-issue

Conversation

@rtaneja1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@matthiasblaesingmatthiasblaesing left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I left comments inline. There is one side question remaining: will the the compiler still work, if it is faced with unsupported parameters?

if (ARG_PARAMETERS.equals(compilerArg.trim())) {
return Arrays.asList(ARG_PARAMETERS);//reqd?
}
return Arrays.asList(compilerArgs);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see the point of this loop. Currently the code results in returning the full list of arguments, if at least one parameter is not null. I tried to provoke a NULL value in the arguments list. None of these variants resulted in a null value:

<arg></arg>
<arg/>
<argxsi:nil="true"xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"/>

So I would propose to return the argument list, if it is not null directly.

return Arrays.asList(ARG_PARAMETERS);
if (compilerArg != null) {
if (ARG_PARAMETERS.equals(compilerArg.trim())) {
return Arrays.asList(ARG_PARAMETERS);//reqd?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the original code there are only two cases:

  • if a compiler argument -parameters was provided, it will be returned
  • else an empty list is returned

This makes sense reading the commit message of the addition:
http://hg.netbeans.org/main-golden/log/tip/maven/src/org/netbeans/modules/maven/queries/PomCompilerOptionsQueryImpl.java
It is basicly a guard to limit the change to that single parameter.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, removed special handling for -parameters here.

@rtaneja1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@matthiasblaesingmatthiasblaesing left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me - thanks for the pointer to the validation code!

PS: Please squash the commits before merge.

@rtaneja1
rtaneja1 merged commit 6152dae into apache:masterMar 25, 2019
@geertjanwgeertjanw added the Cherry Pick Consider cherry picking for release update label Mar 30, 2019
@lkishalmilkishalmi removed the Cherry Pick Consider cherry picking for release update label Jun 29, 2020
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@rtaneja1@matthiasblaesing@lkishalmi@geertjanw
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

maven project compile args not passed to editor javac - #1173

Merged
rtaneja1 merged 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
rtaneja1:rtaneja/maven-compilerargs-issue
Mar 25, 2019
Merged

maven project compile args not passed to editor javac#1173
rtaneja1 merged 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
rtaneja1:rtaneja/maven-compilerargs-issue

Conversation

@rtaneja1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@matthiasblaesingmatthiasblaesing left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I left comments inline. There is one side question remaining: will the the compiler still work, if it is faced with unsupported parameters?

if (ARG_PARAMETERS.equals(compilerArg.trim())) {
return Arrays.asList(ARG_PARAMETERS);//reqd?
}
return Arrays.asList(compilerArgs);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see the point of this loop. Currently the code results in returning the full list of arguments, if at least one parameter is not null. I tried to provoke a NULL value in the arguments list. None of these variants resulted in a null value:

<arg></arg>
<arg/>
<argxsi:nil="true"xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"/>

So I would propose to return the argument list, if it is not null directly.

return Arrays.asList(ARG_PARAMETERS);
if (compilerArg != null) {
if (ARG_PARAMETERS.equals(compilerArg.trim())) {
return Arrays.asList(ARG_PARAMETERS);//reqd?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the original code there are only two cases:

  • if a compiler argument -parameters was provided, it will be returned
  • else an empty list is returned

This makes sense reading the commit message of the addition:
http://hg.netbeans.org/main-golden/log/tip/maven/src/org/netbeans/modules/maven/queries/PomCompilerOptionsQueryImpl.java
It is basicly a guard to limit the change to that single parameter.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, removed special handling for -parameters here.

@rtaneja1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@matthiasblaesingmatthiasblaesing left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me - thanks for the pointer to the validation code!

PS: Please squash the commits before merge.

@rtaneja1
rtaneja1 merged commit 6152dae into apache:masterMar 25, 2019
@geertjanwgeertjanw added the Cherry Pick Consider cherry picking for release update label Mar 30, 2019
@lkishalmilkishalmi removed the Cherry Pick Consider cherry picking for release update label Jun 29, 2020
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@rtaneja1@matthiasblaesing@lkishalmi@geertjanw
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

maven project compile args not passed to editor javac - #1173

Merged
rtaneja1 merged 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
rtaneja1:rtaneja/maven-compilerargs-issue
Mar 25, 2019
Merged

maven project compile args not passed to editor javac#1173
rtaneja1 merged 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
rtaneja1:rtaneja/maven-compilerargs-issue

Conversation

@rtaneja1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@matthiasblaesingmatthiasblaesing left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I left comments inline. There is one side question remaining: will the the compiler still work, if it is faced with unsupported parameters?

if (ARG_PARAMETERS.equals(compilerArg.trim())) {
return Arrays.asList(ARG_PARAMETERS);//reqd?
}
return Arrays.asList(compilerArgs);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see the point of this loop. Currently the code results in returning the full list of arguments, if at least one parameter is not null. I tried to provoke a NULL value in the arguments list. None of these variants resulted in a null value:

<arg></arg>
<arg/>
<argxsi:nil="true"xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"/>

So I would propose to return the argument list, if it is not null directly.

return Arrays.asList(ARG_PARAMETERS);
if (compilerArg != null) {
if (ARG_PARAMETERS.equals(compilerArg.trim())) {
return Arrays.asList(ARG_PARAMETERS);//reqd?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the original code there are only two cases:

  • if a compiler argument -parameters was provided, it will be returned
  • else an empty list is returned

This makes sense reading the commit message of the addition:
http://hg.netbeans.org/main-golden/log/tip/maven/src/org/netbeans/modules/maven/queries/PomCompilerOptionsQueryImpl.java
It is basicly a guard to limit the change to that single parameter.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, removed special handling for -parameters here.

@rtaneja1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@matthiasblaesingmatthiasblaesing left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me - thanks for the pointer to the validation code!

PS: Please squash the commits before merge.

@rtaneja1
rtaneja1 merged commit 6152dae into apache:masterMar 25, 2019
@geertjanwgeertjanw added the Cherry Pick Consider cherry picking for release update label Mar 30, 2019
@lkishalmilkishalmi removed the Cherry Pick Consider cherry picking for release update label Jun 29, 2020
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@rtaneja1@matthiasblaesing@lkishalmi@geertjanw
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

maven project compile args not passed to editor javac - #1173

Merged
rtaneja1 merged 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
rtaneja1:rtaneja/maven-compilerargs-issue
Mar 25, 2019
Merged

maven project compile args not passed to editor javac#1173
rtaneja1 merged 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
rtaneja1:rtaneja/maven-compilerargs-issue

Conversation

@rtaneja1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@matthiasblaesingmatthiasblaesing left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I left comments inline. There is one side question remaining: will the the compiler still work, if it is faced with unsupported parameters?

if (ARG_PARAMETERS.equals(compilerArg.trim())) {
return Arrays.asList(ARG_PARAMETERS);//reqd?
}
return Arrays.asList(compilerArgs);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see the point of this loop. Currently the code results in returning the full list of arguments, if at least one parameter is not null. I tried to provoke a NULL value in the arguments list. None of these variants resulted in a null value:

<arg></arg>
<arg/>
<argxsi:nil="true"xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"/>

So I would propose to return the argument list, if it is not null directly.

return Arrays.asList(ARG_PARAMETERS);
if (compilerArg != null) {
if (ARG_PARAMETERS.equals(compilerArg.trim())) {
return Arrays.asList(ARG_PARAMETERS);//reqd?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the original code there are only two cases:

  • if a compiler argument -parameters was provided, it will be returned
  • else an empty list is returned

This makes sense reading the commit message of the addition:
http://hg.netbeans.org/main-golden/log/tip/maven/src/org/netbeans/modules/maven/queries/PomCompilerOptionsQueryImpl.java
It is basicly a guard to limit the change to that single parameter.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, removed special handling for -parameters here.

@rtaneja1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@matthiasblaesingmatthiasblaesing left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me - thanks for the pointer to the validation code!

PS: Please squash the commits before merge.

@rtaneja1
rtaneja1 merged commit 6152dae into apache:masterMar 25, 2019
@geertjanwgeertjanw added the Cherry Pick Consider cherry picking for release update label Mar 30, 2019
@lkishalmilkishalmi removed the Cherry Pick Consider cherry picking for release update label Jun 29, 2020
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@rtaneja1@matthiasblaesing@lkishalmi@geertjanw
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

maven project compile args not passed to editor javac - #1173

Merged
rtaneja1 merged 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
rtaneja1:rtaneja/maven-compilerargs-issue
Mar 25, 2019
Merged

maven project compile args not passed to editor javac#1173
rtaneja1 merged 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
rtaneja1:rtaneja/maven-compilerargs-issue

Conversation

@rtaneja1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@matthiasblaesingmatthiasblaesing left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I left comments inline. There is one side question remaining: will the the compiler still work, if it is faced with unsupported parameters?

if (ARG_PARAMETERS.equals(compilerArg.trim())) {
return Arrays.asList(ARG_PARAMETERS);//reqd?
}
return Arrays.asList(compilerArgs);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see the point of this loop. Currently the code results in returning the full list of arguments, if at least one parameter is not null. I tried to provoke a NULL value in the arguments list. None of these variants resulted in a null value:

<arg></arg>
<arg/>
<argxsi:nil="true"xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"/>

So I would propose to return the argument list, if it is not null directly.

return Arrays.asList(ARG_PARAMETERS);
if (compilerArg != null) {
if (ARG_PARAMETERS.equals(compilerArg.trim())) {
return Arrays.asList(ARG_PARAMETERS);//reqd?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the original code there are only two cases:

  • if a compiler argument -parameters was provided, it will be returned
  • else an empty list is returned

This makes sense reading the commit message of the addition:
http://hg.netbeans.org/main-golden/log/tip/maven/src/org/netbeans/modules/maven/queries/PomCompilerOptionsQueryImpl.java
It is basicly a guard to limit the change to that single parameter.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, removed special handling for -parameters here.

@rtaneja1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@matthiasblaesingmatthiasblaesing left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me - thanks for the pointer to the validation code!

PS: Please squash the commits before merge.

@rtaneja1
rtaneja1 merged commit 6152dae into apache:masterMar 25, 2019
@geertjanwgeertjanw added the Cherry Pick Consider cherry picking for release update label Mar 30, 2019
@lkishalmilkishalmi removed the Cherry Pick Consider cherry picking for release update label Jun 29, 2020
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@rtaneja1@matthiasblaesing@lkishalmi@geertjanw
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

maven project compile args not passed to editor javac - #1173

Merged
rtaneja1 merged 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
rtaneja1:rtaneja/maven-compilerargs-issue
Mar 25, 2019
Merged

maven project compile args not passed to editor javac#1173
rtaneja1 merged 3 commits into
apache:masterfrom
rtaneja1:rtaneja/maven-compilerargs-issue

Conversation

@rtaneja1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@matthiasblaesingmatthiasblaesing left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I left comments inline. There is one side question remaining: will the the compiler still work, if it is faced with unsupported parameters?

if (ARG_PARAMETERS.equals(compilerArg.trim())) {
return Arrays.asList(ARG_PARAMETERS);//reqd?
}
return Arrays.asList(compilerArgs);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see the point of this loop. Currently the code results in returning the full list of arguments, if at least one parameter is not null. I tried to provoke a NULL value in the arguments list. None of these variants resulted in a null value:

<arg></arg>
<arg/>
<argxsi:nil="true"xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"/>

So I would propose to return the argument list, if it is not null directly.

return Arrays.asList(ARG_PARAMETERS);
if (compilerArg != null) {
if (ARG_PARAMETERS.equals(compilerArg.trim())) {
return Arrays.asList(ARG_PARAMETERS);//reqd?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the original code there are only two cases:

  • if a compiler argument -parameters was provided, it will be returned
  • else an empty list is returned

This makes sense reading the commit message of the addition:
http://hg.netbeans.org/main-golden/log/tip/maven/src/org/netbeans/modules/maven/queries/PomCompilerOptionsQueryImpl.java
It is basicly a guard to limit the change to that single parameter.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, removed special handling for -parameters here.

@rtaneja1

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@matthiasblaesingmatthiasblaesing left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me - thanks for the pointer to the validation code!

PS: Please squash the commits before merge.

@rtaneja1
rtaneja1 merged commit 6152dae into apache:masterMar 25, 2019
@geertjanwgeertjanw added the Cherry Pick Consider cherry picking for release update label Mar 30, 2019
@lkishalmilkishalmi removed the Cherry Pick Consider cherry picking for release update label Jun 29, 2020
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@rtaneja1@matthiasblaesing@lkishalmi@geertjanw