Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
ORC-FORMAT-29: Upgrade protoc and protobuf-java to 3.25.8 - #28
Conversation
cxzl25
commented
Jul 31, 2025
| <groupId>com.google.protobuf</groupId> | ||
| <artifactId>protobuf-java</artifactId> | ||
| <version>3.25.5</version> | ||
| <version>3.25.8</version> |
| <maven.compiler.useIncrementalCompilation>false</maven.compiler.useIncrementalCompilation> | ||
| <maven.version>3.9.6</maven.version> | ||
| <protoc.version>3.17.3</protoc.version> | ||
| <protoc.version>3.25.8</protoc.version> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For the record, this is 25.8 which means 4.25.8.
libprotoc 25.8
cxzl25
commented
Aug 1, 2025
I found a very strange problem Rebuild Jar |
dongjoon-hyun
commented
Aug 13, 2025
Thank you, @cxzl25 . I confirmed the situation of |
dongjoon-hyun
commented
Aug 13, 2025
I verified this PR. v1.0.0 v1.1.0 main branch This PR |
dongjoon-hyun
commented
Aug 13, 2025
The changes look like the following. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It seems that we overlooked this mismatch before because @ekpdt 's suggestion.
protoc and protobuf-java to 3.25.8
dongjoon-hyun
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
+1, LGTM. Thank you, @cxzl25 .
This is backported to branch-1.1 too. |
cxzl25
commented
Aug 14, 2025
Thanks @dongjoon-hyun |
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR aims to upgrade ORC format to 1.1.1. ### Why are the changes needed? This will bring the latest bug fixes. https://github.com/apache/orc-format/milestone/4?closed=1 - apache/orc-format#28 ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? Pass the CIs. ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No. Closes#52069 from williamhyun/orc-format-1.1.1. Authored-by: William Hyun <william@apache.org> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
This PR aims to upgrade ORC format to 1.1.1. This will bring the latest bug fixes. https://github.com/apache/orc-format/milestone/4?closed=1 - apache/orc-format#28 No. Pass the CIs. No. Closes#52069 from williamhyun/orc-format-1.1.1. Authored-by: William Hyun <william@apache.org> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org> (cherry picked from commit d2e550f) Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
This PR aims to upgrade ORC format to 1.1.1. This will bring the latest bug fixes. https://github.com/apache/orc-format/milestone/4?closed=1 - apache/orc-format#28 No. Pass the CIs. No. Closesapache#52069 from williamhyun/orc-format-1.1.1. Authored-by: William Hyun <william@apache.org> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org> (cherry picked from commit 8b50e72) Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>


What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to fix the mismatch between protoc and protobuf in orc-format module.
Why are the changes needed?
Using ORC 2.1.3,
protobuf.GeneratedMessagewill output some warning information.apache/orc#2305
How was this patch tested?
local test
After regenerating orc-format, no warning.
This closes#29