Skip to content

[SPARK-10086] [MLlib] [Streaming] [PySpark] ignore StreamingKMeans test in PySpark for now - #10909

Closed
mengxr wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
mengxr:SPARK-10086
Closed

[SPARK-10086] [MLlib] [Streaming] [PySpark] ignore StreamingKMeans test in PySpark for now#10909
mengxr wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
mengxr:SPARK-10086

Conversation

@mengxr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I saw several failures from recent PR builds, e.g., https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50015/consoleFull. This PR marks the test as ignored and we will fix the flakyness in SPARK-10086.

@gliptak Do you know why the test failure didn't show up in the Jenkins "Test Result"?

cc: @jkbradley

@mengxrmengxr changed the title [MLlib] [Streaming] [PySpark] ignore StreamingKMeans test in PySpark for now[SPARK-10086] [MLlib] [Streaming] [PySpark] ignore StreamingKMeans test in PySpark for nowJan 26, 2016
@SparkQA

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test build #50049 has finished for PR 10909 at commit d7e7aa9.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@gliptak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mengxr Does the test only fail under one of the Python versions?

@jkbradley

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@mengxr Were these all the same test failing? Before, I had seen similar failures from multiple tests.
Also, did the failure rate seem to increase recently?

@jkbradley

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM though, if you want to go ahead and disable it

@mengxr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Some (not all) failures in the last 4 days:

@gliptak The builds listed above have XML report, so I can track test failures. However, the one I posted in PR description (build 50015) doesn't report test result. The test failed with Python 3.4.

Merged into master.

@maver1ck

maver1ck commented Jul 28, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jkbradley
What about merging this to branch-1.6?
I have same problem here:
#14390

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@mengxr@SparkQA@gliptak@jkbradley@maver1ck