Skip to content

Autodetect JAVA_HOME on RPM-based systems - #1185

Closed
mattf wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
mattf:master-1
Closed

Autodetect JAVA_HOME on RPM-based systems#1185
mattf wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
mattf:master-1

Conversation

@mattf

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@AmplabJenkins

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

Comment threadmake-distribution.sh Outdated

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since this script has set -e enabled at the top, could this cause the script to exit prematurely (with no error message) if rpm is not defined?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you are absolutely correct! i've restructured the request and tested by giving a bogus name for the rpm command

@mattf

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@pwendell there's an updated patch attached

@pwendell

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Great, thanks! I've merged this with a slight modification to the message.

pdeyhim pushed a commit to pdeyhim/spark-1 that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2014
Author: Matthew Farrellee <matt@redhat.com>
Closesapache#1185 from mattf/master-1 and squashes the following commits:
42150fc [Matthew Farrellee] Autodetect JAVA_HOME on RPM-based systems
xiliu82 pushed a commit to xiliu82/spark that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2014
Author: Matthew Farrellee <matt@redhat.com>
Closesapache#1185 from mattf/master-1 and squashes the following commits:
42150fc [Matthew Farrellee] Autodetect JAVA_HOME on RPM-based systems
@mattf
mattf deleted the master-1 branch September 6, 2014 18:53
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@mattf@AmplabJenkins@pwendell