Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[SPARK-14239] [ML] Add load for LDAModel that supports both local and distributedModel - #12034
Closed
hhbyyh wants to merge 9 commits into
Closed
[SPARK-14239] [ML] Add load for LDAModel that supports both local and distributedModel#12034hhbyyh wants to merge 9 commits into
hhbyyh wants to merge 9 commits into
Conversation
SparkQA
commented
Mar 29, 2016
Test build #54433 has finished for PR 12034 at commit
|
hhbyyh
commented
Mar 29, 2016
ContributorAuthor
Close this as the git hierarchy is mixed up. I'll send a new one. |
jkbradley
commented
Mar 29, 2016
Member
I think you'll need to close this PR manually. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add load for LDAModel that supports loading both local and distributedModel, as discussed in #9894. So that users don't have to know the details.
How was this patch tested?
Unit tests