Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[SPARK-18639] Build only a single pip package - #16072
Conversation
JoshRosen
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks fine to me, especially since the non-whitespace-change diff is really tiny: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16072/files?w=0
| NAME=$1 | ||
| FLAGS=$2 | ||
| ZINC_PORT=$3 | ||
| BUILD_PIP_PACKAGE=$4 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This style of positional boolean flag won't really work if you ever need to have more than one of these arguments. That said, this is fine for now and if we're really going to add any more complexity here then we should probably just rewrite this whole script in Python.
SparkQA
commented
Nov 30, 2016
Test build #69371 has finished for PR 16072 at commit
|
dongjoon-hyun
commented
Nov 30, 2016
Retest this please |
SparkQA
commented
Nov 30, 2016
Test build #69384 has started for PR 16072 at commit |
SparkQA
commented
Nov 30, 2016
Test build #3445 has finished for PR 16072 at commit
|
rxin
commented
Dec 2, 2016
Merging in master/branch-2.1. |
## What changes were proposed in this pull request? We current build 5 separate pip binary tar balls, doubling the release script runtime. It'd be better to build one, especially for use cases that are just using Spark locally. In the long run, it would make more sense to have Hadoop support be pluggable. ## How was this patch tested? N/A - this is a release build script that doesn't have any automated test coverage. We will know if it goes wrong when we prepare releases. Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com> Closes#16072 from rxin/SPARK-18639. (cherry picked from commit 37e52f8) Signed-off-by: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
## What changes were proposed in this pull request? We current build 5 separate pip binary tar balls, doubling the release script runtime. It'd be better to build one, especially for use cases that are just using Spark locally. In the long run, it would make more sense to have Hadoop support be pluggable. ## How was this patch tested? N/A - this is a release build script that doesn't have any automated test coverage. We will know if it goes wrong when we prepare releases. Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com> Closesapache#16072 from rxin/SPARK-18639.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request? We current build 5 separate pip binary tar balls, doubling the release script runtime. It'd be better to build one, especially for use cases that are just using Spark locally. In the long run, it would make more sense to have Hadoop support be pluggable. ## How was this patch tested? N/A - this is a release build script that doesn't have any automated test coverage. We will know if it goes wrong when we prepare releases. Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com> Closesapache#16072 from rxin/SPARK-18639.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We current build 5 separate pip binary tar balls, doubling the release script runtime. It'd be better to build one, especially for use cases that are just using Spark locally. In the long run, it would make more sense to have Hadoop support be pluggable.
How was this patch tested?
N/A - this is a release build script that doesn't have any automated test coverage. We will know if it goes wrong when we prepare releases.