Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[SPARK-20620][TEST]Improve some unit tests for NullExpressionsSuite and TypeCoercionSuite - #17880
[SPARK-20620][TEST]Improve some unit tests for NullExpressionsSuite and TypeCoercionSuite#1788010110346 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This test is part of the test case test("coalesce casts") in TypeCoercionSuite. If you want, you can improve that test case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The same for this. It is being covered by the test case test("type coercion for If") in TypeCoercionSuite. If you want, you can improve that test case.
10110346
commented
May 7, 2017
@gatorsmile thanks,l will do it. |
c75c36b to
3f99750CompareThere was a problem hiding this comment.
(I guess this should be longLit )
SparkQA
commented
May 8, 2017
Test build #3699 has finished for PR 17880 at commit
|
10110346
commented
May 19, 2017
I have modify |
SparkQA
commented
May 19, 2017
Test build #3731 has finished for PR 17880 at commit
|
gatorsmile
commented
May 29, 2017
retest this please |
gatorsmile
commented
May 29, 2017
LGTM pending Jenkins. |
SparkQA
commented
May 29, 2017
Test build #77507 has finished for PR 17880 at commit
|
10110346
commented
Jun 5, 2017
Test passed, thanks. @gatorsmile |
gatorsmile
commented
Jun 10, 2017
retest this please |
SparkQA
commented
Jun 10, 2017
Test build #77871 has finished for PR 17880 at commit
|
…and TypeCoercionSuite ## What changes were proposed in this pull request? add more datatype for some unit tests ## How was this patch tested? unit tests Author: liuxian <liu.xian3@zte.com.cn> Closesapache#17880 from 10110346/wip_lx_0506.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
add more datatype for some unit tests
How was this patch tested?
unit tests