Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[SPARK-20554][BUILD] Remove usage of scala.language.reflectiveCalls - #17949
Closed
srowen wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
[SPARK-20554][BUILD] Remove usage of scala.language.reflectiveCalls#17949srowen wants to merge 1 commit into
srowen wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…sary or probably resulting in more complex code
SparkQA
commented
May 11, 2017
Test build #76798 has finished for PR 17949 at commit
|
srowen
commented
May 12, 2017
MemberAuthor
Merged to master/2.2 |
asfgit pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 12, 2017
## What changes were proposed in this pull request? Remove uses of scala.language.reflectiveCalls that are either unnecessary or probably resulting in more complex code. This turned out to be less significant than I thought, but, still worth a touch-up. ## How was this patch tested? Existing tests. Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com> Closes#17949 from srowen/SPARK-20554. (cherry picked from commit fc8a2b6) Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com>
robert3005 pushed a commit
to palantir/spark
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2017
## What changes were proposed in this pull request? Remove uses of scala.language.reflectiveCalls that are either unnecessary or probably resulting in more complex code. This turned out to be less significant than I thought, but, still worth a touch-up. ## How was this patch tested? Existing tests. Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com> Closesapache#17949 from srowen/SPARK-20554.
lycplus pushed a commit
to lycplus/spark
that referenced
this pull request
May 24, 2017
## What changes were proposed in this pull request? Remove uses of scala.language.reflectiveCalls that are either unnecessary or probably resulting in more complex code. This turned out to be less significant than I thought, but, still worth a touch-up. ## How was this patch tested? Existing tests. Author: Sean Owen <sowen@cloudera.com> Closesapache#17949 from srowen/SPARK-20554.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove uses of scala.language.reflectiveCalls that are either unnecessary or probably resulting in more complex code. This turned out to be less significant than I thought, but, still worth a touch-up.
How was this patch tested?
Existing tests.