Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[SPARK-21946][TEST]: fix flaky test: "alter table: rename cached table" in InMemoryCatalogedDDLSuite - #19159
Closed
kiszk wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
[SPARK-21946][TEST]: fix flaky test: "alter table: rename cached table" in InMemoryCatalogedDDLSuite#19159kiszk wants to merge 1 commit into
kiszk wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
gatorsmile
approved these changes
Sep 8, 2017
gatorsmile
commented
Sep 8, 2017
Member
LGTM pending Jenkins. |
dongjoon-hyun
approved these changes
Sep 8, 2017
dongjoon-hyun
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
+1, LGTM, too.
Thank you for picking up this, @kiszk .
SparkQA
commented
Sep 8, 2017
Test build #81539 has finished for PR 19159 at commit
|
dongjoon-hyun
commented
Sep 8, 2017
Member
Retest this please. |
SparkQA
commented
Sep 8, 2017
Test build #81543 has finished for PR 19159 at commit
|
gatorsmile
commented
Sep 8, 2017
Member
Thanks! Merged to master/2.2 |
asfgit pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2017
…" in InMemoryCatalogedDDLSuite ## What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR fixes flaky test `InMemoryCatalogedDDLSuite "alter table: rename cached table"`. Since this test validates distributed DataFrame, the result should be checked by using `checkAnswer`. The original version used `df.collect().Seq` method that does not guaranty an order of each element of the result. ## How was this patch tested? Use existing test case Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com> Closes#19159 from kiszk/SPARK-21946. (cherry picked from commit 8a4f228) Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
MatthewRBruce pushed a commit
to Shopify/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2018
…" in InMemoryCatalogedDDLSuite ## What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR fixes flaky test `InMemoryCatalogedDDLSuite "alter table: rename cached table"`. Since this test validates distributed DataFrame, the result should be checked by using `checkAnswer`. The original version used `df.collect().Seq` method that does not guaranty an order of each element of the result. ## How was this patch tested? Use existing test case Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com> Closesapache#19159 from kiszk/SPARK-21946. (cherry picked from commit 8a4f228) Signed-off-by: gatorsmile <gatorsmile@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes flaky test
InMemoryCatalogedDDLSuite "alter table: rename cached table".Since this test validates distributed DataFrame, the result should be checked by using
checkAnswer. The original version useddf.collect().Seqmethod that does not guaranty an order of each element of the result.How was this patch tested?
Use existing test case