Skip to content

[SPARK-23656][Test] Perform assertions in XXH64Suite.testKnownByteArrayInputs() on big endian platform, too - #20804

Closed
kiszk wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
kiszk:SPARK-23656
Closed

[SPARK-23656][Test] Perform assertions in XXH64Suite.testKnownByteArrayInputs() on big endian platform, too#20804
kiszk wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
kiszk:SPARK-23656

Conversation

@kiszk

@kiszkkiszk commented Mar 12, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR enables assertions in XXH64Suite.testKnownByteArrayInputs() on big endian platform, too. The current implementation performs them only on little endian platform. This PR increase test coverage of big endian platform.

How was this patch tested?

Updated XXH64Suite
Tested on big endian platform using JIT compiler or interpreter -Xint.

@SparkQA

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test build #88183 has finished for PR 20804 at commit b694365.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@kiszk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@hvanhovell could you please review this?

@hvanhovell

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

LGTM - merging to master. Thanks!

mstewart141 pushed a commit to mstewart141/spark that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2018
…ayInputs() on big endian platform, too
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR enables assertions in `XXH64Suite.testKnownByteArrayInputs()` on big endian platform, too. The current implementation performs them only on little endian platform. This PR increase test coverage of big endian platform.
## How was this patch tested?
Updated `XXH64Suite`
Tested on big endian platform using JIT compiler or interpreter `-Xint`.
Author: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Closesapache#20804 from kiszk/SPARK-23656.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@kiszk@SparkQA@hvanhovell