Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[SPARK-1087] Move python traceback utilities into new traceback_utils.py file. - #2385
[SPARK-1087] Move python traceback utilities into new traceback_utils.py file.#2385staple wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
SparkQA
commented
Sep 14, 2014
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
JoshRosen
commented
Sep 14, 2014
Jenkins, this is ok to test. |
SparkQA
commented
Sep 14, 2014
QA tests have started for PR 2385 at commit
|
jyotiska
commented
Sep 14, 2014
LGTM. |
SparkQA
commented
Sep 14, 2014
QA tests have finished for PR 2385 at commit
|
staple
commented
Sep 14, 2014
Hi, the above failure in NetworkReceiverSuite.scala seems like it may be unrelated to this patch. That test also passed when I ran locally. |
SparkQA
commented
Sep 14, 2014
QA tests have started for PR 2385 at commit
|
SparkQA
commented
Sep 15, 2014
QA tests have finished for PR 2385 at commit
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
it's better to only call extract_concise_traceback() once, such as:
self._callsite = extract_concise_traceback()
if self._callsite is None:
xxxx
davies
commented
Sep 15, 2014
LGTM, just one minor comment, it's not must to have. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks like I also need to put JavaStackTrace here instead of SparkContext.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
They are just internal interfaces, so it's fine to not have all here. If having, it should be JavaStackTrace
staple
commented
Sep 15, 2014
Hi - I addressed the review comments and made some additional cosmetic changes. |
SparkQA
commented
Sep 15, 2014
QA tests have started for PR 2385 at commit
|
SparkQA
commented
Sep 15, 2014
QA tests have finished for PR 2385 at commit
|
JoshRosen
commented
Sep 16, 2014
This looks good to me, so I'm going to merge it. Thanks! |
staple
commented
Sep 16, 2014
Great! Thanks to all the reviewers. |
Also made some cosmetic cleanups.