Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[SPARK-32237][SQL][3.0] Resolve hint in CTE - #29201
Closed
LantaoJin wants to merge 2 commits into
Closed
Conversation
SparkQA
commented
Jul 23, 2020
Test build #126399 has finished for PR 29201 at commit
|
LantaoJin
commented
Jul 23, 2020
ContributorAuthor
retest this please |
SparkQA
commented
Jul 23, 2020
Test build #126410 has finished for PR 29201 at commit
|
dongjoon-hyun
commented
Jul 23, 2020
Member
Could you resolve conflicts, @LantaoJin ? |
dongjoon-hyun
commented
Jul 23, 2020
Member
Also, cc @HyukjinKwon for |
HyukjinKwon
commented
Jul 24, 2020
Member
@dongjoon-hyun, I will backport #29117. Thanks for letting me know. |
dongjoon-hyun
commented
Jul 24, 2020
Member
Thank you for resolving conflicts, @LantaoJin . |
cloud-fan
commented
Jul 24, 2020
Contributor
thanks, merging to 3.0! |
cloud-fan pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2020
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? The backport of #29062 This PR is to move `Substitution` rule before `Hints` rule in `Analyzer` to avoid hint in CTE not working. ### Why are the changes needed? Below SQL in Spark3.0 will throw AnalysisException, but it works in Spark2.x ```sql WITH cte AS (SELECT /*+ REPARTITION(3) */ T.id, T.data FROM $t1 T) SELECT cte.id, cte.data FROM cte ``` ``` Failed to analyze query: org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: cannot resolve '`cte.id`' given input columns: [cte.data, cte.id]; line 3 pos 7; 'Project ['cte.id, 'cte.data] +- SubqueryAlias cte +- Project [id#21L, data#22] +- SubqueryAlias T +- SubqueryAlias testcat.ns1.ns2.tbl +- RelationV2[id#21L, data#22] testcat.ns1.ns2.tbl 'Project ['cte.id, 'cte.data] +- SubqueryAlias cte +- Project [id#21L, data#22] +- SubqueryAlias T +- SubqueryAlias testcat.ns1.ns2.tbl +- RelationV2[id#21L, data#22] testcat.ns1.ns2.tbl ``` ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Add a unit test Closes#29201 from LantaoJin/SPARK-32237_branch-3.0. Lead-authored-by: LantaoJin <jinlantao@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alan Jin <jinlantao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
AmplabJenkins
commented
Jul 24, 2020
Test FAILed. |
dongjoon-hyun pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2020
…g in Jenkins ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR backports #29117 to branch-3.0 as the flakiness was found in branch-3.0 too: #29201 (comment) and #29201 (comment) This PR proposes: - ~~Don't use `--user` in pip packaging test~~ - ~~Pull `source` out of the subshell, and place it first.~~ - Exclude user sitepackages in Python path during pip installation test to address the flakiness of the pip packaging test in Jenkins. ~~(I think) #29116 caused this flakiness given my observation in the Jenkins log. I had to work around by specifying `--user` but it turned out that it does not properly work in old Conda on Jenkins for some reasons. Therefore, reverting this change back.~~ (I think) the installation at user site-packages affects other environments created by Conda in the old Conda version that Jenkins has. Seems it fails to isolate the environments for some reasons. So, it excludes user sitepackages in the Python path during the test. ~~In addition, #29116 also added some fallback logics of `conda (de)activate` and `source (de)activate` because Conda prefers to use `conda (de)activate` now per the official documentation and `source (de)activate` doesn't work for some reasons in certain environments (see also conda/conda#7980). The problem was that `source` loads things to the current shell so does not affect the current shell. Therefore, this PR pulls `source` out of the subshell.~~ Disclaimer: I made the analysis purely based on Jenkins machine's log in this PR. It may have a different reason I missed during my observation. ### Why are the changes needed? To make the build and tests pass in Jenkins. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No, dev-only. ### How was this patch tested? Jenkins tests should test it out. Closes#29215 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-32363-3.0. Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The backport of #29062
This PR is to move
Substitutionrule beforeHintsrule inAnalyzerto avoid hint in CTE not working.Why are the changes needed?
Below SQL in Spark3.0 will throw AnalysisException, but it works in Spark2.x
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
How was this patch tested?
Add a unit test