Skip to content

[SPARK-33183][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Update rule RemoveRedundantSorts config version - #30420

Closed
allisonwang-db wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
allisonwang-db:spark-33183-follow-up
Closed

[SPARK-33183][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Update rule RemoveRedundantSorts config version#30420
allisonwang-db wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
allisonwang-db:spark-33183-follow-up

Conversation

@allisonwang-db

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR is a follow up for #30093 to updates the config spark.sql.execution.removeRedundantSorts version to 2.4.8.

Why are the changes needed?

To update the rule version it has been backported to 2.4. #30194

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No

How was this patch tested?

N/A

@SparkQA

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Kubernetes integration test starting
URL: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/35924/

@SparkQA

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Kubernetes integration test status failure
URL: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/35924/

@maropumaropu left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@SparkQA

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test build #131320 has finished for PR 30420 at commit 14114ac.

  • This patch fails due to an unknown error code, -9.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@dongjoon-hyundongjoon-hyun left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, LGTM. Thank you, @allisonwang-db and @maropu .
Merged to master.

@allisonwang-db
allisonwang-db deleted the spark-33183-follow-up branch January 19, 2024 01:21
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@allisonwang-db@SparkQA@maropu@dongjoon-hyun