Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
[SPARK-33803][SQL] Sort table properties by key in DESCRIBE TABLE command - #30799
Closed
HyukjinKwon wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
[SPARK-33803][SQL] Sort table properties by key in DESCRIBE TABLE command#30799HyukjinKwon wants to merge 1 commit into
HyukjinKwon wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
HyukjinKwon
commented
Dec 16, 2020
MemberAuthor
@cloud-fan can you take a quick look? |
HyukjinKwon
commented
Dec 16, 2020
MemberAuthor
Thanks @dongjoon-hyun! It's super late in your time .. :-). |
dongjoon-hyun
commented
Dec 16, 2020
Member
It's a catch-up before going to bed. :) |
cloud-fan
approved these changes
Dec 16, 2020
SparkQA
commented
Dec 16, 2020
Kubernetes integration test starting |
SparkQA
commented
Dec 16, 2020
Kubernetes integration test status success |
SparkQA
commented
Dec 16, 2020
Test build #132873 has finished for PR 30799 at commit
|
cloud-fan
commented
Dec 16, 2020
Contributor
thanks, merging to master/3.1! |
cloud-fan pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2020
…mand ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR proposes to sort table properties in DESCRIBE TABLE command. This is consistent with DSv2 command as well: https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/e3058ba17cb4512537953eb4ded884e24ee93ba2/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/v2/DescribeTableExec.scala#L63 This PR fixes the test case in Scala 2.13 build as well where the table properties have different order in the map. ### Why are the changes needed? To keep the deterministic and pretty output, and fix the tests in Scala 2.13 build. See https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/spark-master-test-maven-hadoop-3.2-scala-2.13/49/testReport/junit/org.apache.spark.sql/SQLQueryTestSuite/describe_sql/ ``` describe.sql Expected "...spark_catalog, view.[query.out.col.2=c, view.referredTempFunctionsNames=[], view.catalogAndNamespace.part.1=default]]", but got "...spark_catalog, view.[catalogAndNamespace.part.1=default, view.query.out.col.2=c, view.referredTempFunctionsNames=[]]]" Result did not match for query #29 DESC FORMATTED v ``` ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Yes, it will change the text output from `DESCRIBE [EXTENDED|FORMATTED] table_name`. Now the table properties are sorted by its key. ### How was this patch tested? Related unittests were fixed accordingly. Closes#30799 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-33803. Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <gurwls223@apache.org> Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com> (cherry picked from commit 7845865) Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
MaxGekk
reviewed
Dec 17, 2020
Comment on lines
+391
to
+392
| val tableProperties = properties.toSeq.sortBy(_._1) | ||
| .map(p => p._1 + "=" + p._2).mkString("[", ", ", "]") |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should we sort by entire strings (._1 and ._2)? For example, if you have key0 = b and key0 = a, you may get unstable output either [key0 = b, key0 = a] or [key0 = a, key0 = b]
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ah, sorry, we can guarantee uniqueness of keys.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to sort table properties in DESCRIBE TABLE command. This is consistent with DSv2 command as well:
spark/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/v2/DescribeTableExec.scala
Line 63 in e3058ba
This PR fixes the test case in Scala 2.13 build as well where the table properties have different order in the map.
Why are the changes needed?
To keep the deterministic and pretty output, and fix the tests in Scala 2.13 build.
See https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/spark-master-test-maven-hadoop-3.2-scala-2.13/49/testReport/junit/org.apache.spark.sql/SQLQueryTestSuite/describe_sql/
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, it will change the text output from
DESCRIBE [EXTENDED|FORMATTED] table_name.Now the table properties are sorted by its key.
How was this patch tested?
Related unittests were fixed accordingly.